High Pressure, Moderate Advancement, Little Support - Associate Director Genentech Employee Review

2.0
May 20, 2010
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great people! Very bright, very committed and fun to work with. Excellent pay and benefits. And lots of little perks like a concierge service and onsite massages, haircuts and car washes. The best corporate cafeteries I have ever eaten at. High prestige. People in the field know and respect Genentech and that halo gives off a nice glow.

Cons

Very high pressure and the corporate structure and conflicting institutional imperatives make it very hard to get things done. this is particular true in the various marketing and sales related functions. Clinical and legal set the agenda in the company and take very conservative positions in terms of marketing and sales efforts. That is fine but the people at the top of marketing and the commercial side of the company are continually putting pressure to deliver a bigger number and develop innovative and cutting edge programs. As a result commerical is continually butting heads with legal and clinical and the conflict takes place at the level of product manager to attorney. The product manager has no leverage in that discussion but they get little support from their upper management or forgiveness when they can't deliver. Genentech is moving more and more towards being simply another big pharma company. The merger with Roche will accelerate that. The mis-match in culture between those big pharma people being brought in to run the company and the people who came to Genentech because of its more "independent" reputation has made it difficult for many of those people to move up in the company.

Explore other reviews about Genentech

5.0
Jul 8, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great culture and work environment.

Cons

PhD is necessary oftentimes for advancement.

3.0
May 7, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Genentech's origin story and mission are genuinely inspiring — few companies can point to such a meaningful historical arc in medicine. Patient engagement is taken seriously and feels authentic, not performative. The campus is beautiful and the culture has real warmth.

Cons

DDA is operating with significant gaps. First, the foundational data infrastructure is not mature enough to support the ambitions being set for the team. Second, the measurement culture has gotten ahead of the methodology, and no one in a position of authority seems to be asking hard questions about whether the numbers actually mean what they're being presented as meaning. Third, some management feel disconnected from the work itself, lacking the knowledge, hands-on experience, or relevant credentials. Individually any one of these would be manageable. Together these create an environment where it's hard to do rigorous work, rather work is performative, and be recognized for it.

3
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All