employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

General Motors (GM)

Engaged Employer

Proceed with caution - Manufacturing Engineer General Motors (GM) Employee Review

2.0
Aug 14, 2008
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good pay, but not equivalent when time is considered. The company is so large that good work is boxed in a manufacturing plant, never noticed by the top of the food chain. GM is in need of competent employees and the job keeps you on your toes.

Cons

The hours and schedule shifts based on production output. May work day on week and nights the next. There is not a lot of growth in the company unless you know the top execs. In addition, there is so much downsizing required to stay afloat, and lost volume through the downsizing that I would be nervous each night for job placency.

Explore other reviews about General Motors (GM)

5.0
Apr 30, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Work life balance is great

Cons

Decent but slow burn layoffs

avatar
General Motors (GM) Response
2mo
Thank you for taking the time to share your experience with us. We would like to thank you for your continued contributions to GM and appreciate the feedback!
2.0
Jul 16, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I was able to learn some interesting things in robotics, computer vision, etc. These jobs can be hard to come by, so it was a nice entry point. Plenty of chances to prove your worth, considering the incompetence of some of the managers and leads (but dont expect to be paid for the effort, you gotta show the effort first and you *might* get an early promotion)

Cons

Layoffs are frequent and nonsensical. Absolutely no warning that it will happen, you just wake up one day with the meeting on your calendar. Pay is OK. After being laid off late May, I found a job in a month or two that paid more (150k base -> 180k base) The things I learned were almost entirely self taught. Leads and management provided zero structure. They didnt use jira at all. They didnt write up business requirements for projects. Leads didnt create technical requirements. Milestones were vague. Everything was completely unorganized due to the inexperience of upper management and engineering leadership.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All