Expectations - Anonymous employee Georgia-Pacific Employee Review

3.0
May 24, 2019
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great benefits, competitive salary structure, seemed to have opportunity for growth, there are many great people that work for the company.

Cons

Lack of training opportunities, communication gaps, fear of retaliation if concerns are taken to higher authority per relationships amongst management within department. Be very clear on the “expectations” as they will be clear on you “not meeting” what was never explained. No opportunity to improve if you don’t meet the expectations you’re unaware of; some managers would rather just lose the talent completely than to fix their inability to train and lead employees.

avatar
Georgia-Pacific Response
7y
Hello- thank you for taking the time to leave us a review. MBM® is the framework and business philosophy we apply to our everyday work and business goals. As we continue to look at how we are leveraging this philosophy and practice, we appreciate your feedback on areas to improve. I would encourage you to speak to your local HR contact around any concerns or if you wish to remain anonymous, please contact our Guideline at www.reportlineweb.com/georgiapacific. Thank you- Molly from GP

Explore other reviews about Georgia-Pacific

5.0
May 30, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good pay, good benefits, stable job

Cons

Lots of travel, very corporate

2.0
Jul 7, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Talented and hardworking electricians, operators, mechanics, and plant personnel. Interesting automation and controls work with opportunities to solve challenging technical problems. Significant autonomy at the local level when responding to production issues. Good compensation and benefits. Corporate engineering resources are knowledgeable and generally willing to help.

Cons

Expectations and priorities frequently changed without corresponding adjustments to workload. Performance feedback lacked important operational context, such as competing priorities, project reassignment, and resource constraints. Communication tended to favor frequent meetings over clear written expectations. Accommodation requests and communication support were difficult to navigate and lacked a clear process. Single-engineer staffing model creates a challenging environment for vacations, medical appointments, training, and long-term sustainability. Heavy emphasis on immediate deliverables can make long-term engineering work and root-cause analysis difficult.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All