Dead End Career Choice - Engineer Georgia-Pacific Employee Review

1.0
May 24, 2013
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The people who work below upper management are some of the best in the industry, unfortunately the upper management lacks the guiding principle of humility which blinds them from awknowledging this.

Cons

Failure to grasp the true meaning of MBM. No concept of what it takes to retain talent or what competitive pay means. GP is nothing more than a stepping stone to a true career path.

Explore other reviews about Georgia-Pacific

5.0
Jul 7, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Flexible. Good team. Fulfilling. Kind people

Cons

Plant people can be irritable

2.0
Jul 7, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Talented and hardworking electricians, operators, mechanics, and plant personnel. Interesting automation and controls work with opportunities to solve challenging technical problems. Significant autonomy at the local level when responding to production issues. Good compensation and benefits. Corporate engineering resources are knowledgeable and generally willing to help.

Cons

Expectations and priorities frequently changed without corresponding adjustments to workload. Performance feedback lacked important operational context, such as competing priorities, project reassignment, and resource constraints. Communication tended to favor frequent meetings over clear written expectations. Accommodation requests and communication support were difficult to navigate and lacked a clear process. Single-engineer staffing model creates a challenging environment for vacations, medical appointments, training, and long-term sustainability. Heavy emphasis on immediate deliverables can make long-term engineering work and root-cause analysis difficult.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All