Great people but no raises make it hard to work for GP for more than 3 or 4 years. - Anonymous employee Georgia-Pacific Employee Review

2.0
Dec 11, 2013
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

In the few years that I have worked at the Georgia-Pacific Port Hudson facility I met and worked with some very good people. The hourly workers were hard working and want the facility to make money, but senior management usually gets in their way. The starting salary is pretty good compared to other paper mills but not as good as the chemical plants in the surrounding area.

Cons

It is very difficult to get a raise at GP Port Hudson. Very few salaried people in my department have had a raise in the past 5 years, and the so called "performance pay" is pretty dismal. The management philosophy is to award raises based on value created for the company, but value creation is rarely the prerequisite for a raise. Instead, those individuals that do get the raises are buddies with the senior management team. The lack of raises lead to a unusually high turnover rate because the Port Hudson facility is located in a high growth and high pay manufacturing area. Senior management expects the salaried employees to work 50 - 60 hours a week but offer little to no incentives for the employees, other than fear for your job.

Explore other reviews about Georgia-Pacific

5.0
Jun 17, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

good company and people to work

Cons

nothing so far i experience

2.0
Jul 7, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Talented and hardworking electricians, operators, mechanics, and plant personnel. Interesting automation and controls work with opportunities to solve challenging technical problems. Significant autonomy at the local level when responding to production issues. Good compensation and benefits. Corporate engineering resources are knowledgeable and generally willing to help.

Cons

Expectations and priorities frequently changed without corresponding adjustments to workload. Performance feedback lacked important operational context, such as competing priorities, project reassignment, and resource constraints. Communication tended to favor frequent meetings over clear written expectations. Accommodation requests and communication support were difficult to navigate and lacked a clear process. Single-engineer staffing model creates a challenging environment for vacations, medical appointments, training, and long-term sustainability. Heavy emphasis on immediate deliverables can make long-term engineering work and root-cause analysis difficult.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All