Poor leadership and "yes men" Middle Management - Portfolio Manager Georgia-Pacific Employee Review

2.0
Apr 11, 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

GP as a whole is a good company, and well managed. GPR Trader position is good way to sell wastepaper before taking next step into Sales Manager position in domestic and international markets. Face-to-face customer visits are key in this business and the relationship building is key.

Cons

GPR (Harmon) does not follow Koch Guiding Principles or MBM. Subjective Variable Compensation plan; no logic or transparency to receive bonuses and commissions. Limited support from inside sales/export/customer service/order management/accounting/logistics and other capabilities. Middle management, don't have decision rights and will take orders in a "top-down" approach. Career discussions and salary reviews proved to be meaningless, as management did not want to promote from within.

avatar
Georgia-Pacific Response
4y
Hi, this is Cali from the Talent Solutions team. I appreciate you taking the time to leave your feedback and share your concerns. It is an expectation that all sites are upholding MBM, and every employee at all Koch companies are being stewards of our Guiding Principles. It is also an expectation each employee is consistently discussing their role, responsibilities, and expectations, along with compensation with their supervisor. Please know I’ll be passing your review along to the appropriate leadership teams as feedback. Wishing you all the best, Cali from Talent Solutions

Explore other reviews about Georgia-Pacific

5.0
Jul 7, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Flexible. Good team. Fulfilling. Kind people

Cons

Plant people can be irritable

2.0
Jul 7, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Talented and hardworking electricians, operators, mechanics, and plant personnel. Interesting automation and controls work with opportunities to solve challenging technical problems. Significant autonomy at the local level when responding to production issues. Good compensation and benefits. Corporate engineering resources are knowledgeable and generally willing to help.

Cons

Expectations and priorities frequently changed without corresponding adjustments to workload. Performance feedback lacked important operational context, such as competing priorities, project reassignment, and resource constraints. Communication tended to favor frequent meetings over clear written expectations. Accommodation requests and communication support were difficult to navigate and lacked a clear process. Single-engineer staffing model creates a challenging environment for vacations, medical appointments, training, and long-term sustainability. Heavy emphasis on immediate deliverables can make long-term engineering work and root-cause analysis difficult.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All