“Good company with some bad apples in mid-management” - Engineering Manager Georgia-Pacific Employee Review

3.0
Jun 23, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Pay was reasonable and the Atlanta office provided some nice perks such as covered parking, daycare, onsite cafeteria, and coffee bar, etc. Company had good values and senior management is pushing the company in the right direction.

Cons

Mid level management(director and VP level) in Building Products Engineering isn't being held accountable. They aren't pushing the values that are being passed down from senior management. They're trying to continue working in years past and not open to new technology that makes day to day task easier. There is no mentorship for employees looking to move up. Bonuses are rarely given. The leaders in this department haven't done large project work in over 20 years when the demand for their products was high. This old guard management is having a difficult time adjusting to the new landscape in engineering and construction as new technology has improved both construction techniques and administrative processes while government interaction has also increased. Additionally, they're having a hard time working well with other functional teams. There is a lot of finger pointing which doesn't lead to productivity. Experienced employees familiar with such practices aren't valued and instructed to copy past work rather right or wrong. I would avoid this department if looking for a position in engineering. Fortunately, GP is a huge company with multiple organizations. I would target their consumer products division if looking for a position in engineering.

Explore other reviews about Georgia-Pacific

5.0
Apr 8, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The growth potential here is unmatched

Cons

Average compensation and benefits compared to comparable companies

4.0
Jun 30, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Schedule, flexibility, pay, co- workers, relationships

Cons

No COLA, annual reviews pushed back, comp reviews consistently pushed back even further. Non value added meetings & ‘fluff’ with Koch book reading requirements (which directly conflict in the respect philosophy when it comes to comp reviews), no consistency in business units- ie. Moving from one to another group a vast difference in how they treat/respect employees

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All