An ok place to body build while they pay you, but too many old school managers giving lipservice only to Koch's MBM's - Upper Production and All Maintenance At Manager Whims Georgia-Pacific Employee Review

3.0
Jan 11, 2011
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good hard work can build up your bodies; Paid during 30 min. lunch breaks; Lot of money being poured into rebuilding old parts of the plant might equal job security; Two weeks vacation advanced to new employees during first year if 6 months or more left in year; Partially paid insurance plans; sick pay maybe available; Able to internally bid on openings once or twice a year if meet stringent qualifications and can be released from old position. top craft pay would be working leader in Electrical Maint. at around $22 per hour

Cons

Work can be very greasy, dusty, hot sweaty, dangerous -Summer and opposite temps in Winter; Lunch breaks can be shifted or canceled for equipment down times, or if relief doesn't show; Another location with a lot of brand new equipment was suddenly shut down; first 90 days has absolute zero toleration for any lates or absenses or infractions of rules. Your part pay increases on insurance plans and is higher than other similar locations If you bid, and find out the job is not to your liking, barred from bidding for long time; Top craft in other industries of similar skills is possibly $15 higher

Explore other reviews about Georgia-Pacific

5.0
May 30, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good pay, good benefits, stable job

Cons

Lots of travel, very corporate

2.0
Jul 7, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Talented and hardworking electricians, operators, mechanics, and plant personnel. Interesting automation and controls work with opportunities to solve challenging technical problems. Significant autonomy at the local level when responding to production issues. Good compensation and benefits. Corporate engineering resources are knowledgeable and generally willing to help.

Cons

Expectations and priorities frequently changed without corresponding adjustments to workload. Performance feedback lacked important operational context, such as competing priorities, project reassignment, and resource constraints. Communication tended to favor frequent meetings over clear written expectations. Accommodation requests and communication support were difficult to navigate and lacked a clear process. Single-engineer staffing model creates a challenging environment for vacations, medical appointments, training, and long-term sustainability. Heavy emphasis on immediate deliverables can make long-term engineering work and root-cause analysis difficult.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All