Lacking efforts in retaining employees - Mechanical Engineer Halliburton Employee Review

2.0
Jun 9, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Supportive teammates who are willing to teach and share information, and help one another. - Company provides 2-way transport. - Plenty of career opportunities within organization. - Minimum-to-zero politics within department (probably because there is no performance/variable bonus for this role). - Decent insurance benefits - Cheap canteen food

Cons

- No variable/performance bonus or profit-sharing regardless of the work you've contributed to the business, only 13th month (AWS) for this role. - Low increments every year, such that fresh graduate new hires' remuneration can easily catch up with engineers with at least 2 years experience in the company. - Depending on project, may need to stay up for night calls to collaborate with US folks due to time zone differences (same for our US counterpart). - ZERO effort by senior management to retain current employees. Current junior to mid-level engineers are leaving the company before they reach senior level, this led to a concerning gap in knowledge between the junior- and senior-level engineers. - Excessive processes in place that can hinder project delivery on top of unrealistic project schedule committed. Need a proper balance between business needs, internal company processes and project timeline.

Explore other reviews about Halliburton

5.0
Jun 29, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The company has great benefits

Cons

The con would be you are constantly in inclement weather.

1.0
Jun 18, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

* Strong brand recognition and opportunity to work on large-scale marketing initiatives. * Exposure to technical subject matter and cross-functional collaboration. * Good place to learn how large enterprise organizations operate.

Cons

I joined in a hybrid role where flexibility was an important factor in accepting the position and making personal life decisions. Within about a year, the organization moved to a full return-to-office model. While companies can change workplace policies, the transition felt abrupt and inconsistent in practice. A recurring challenge was that expectations around in-office presence did not always appear to match day-to-day reality. Remote participation still occurred for meetings and operational needs, which created confusion around when flexibility was acceptable and when it was not. Within my department, I also experienced challenges around communication and collaboration. Feedback on projects sometimes arrived late or only after priorities had shifted, and in some cases work was reassigned or substantially changed without clear involvement from the original contributor. Public criticism of work product without prior coaching made it difficult to improve or feel ownership over deliverables. Leadership communication during organizational changes often felt more focused on compliance than employee concerns. Employees raising questions about work arrangements sometimes perceived limited space for open discussion. Over time, the combination of reduced flexibility, inconsistent application of expectations, and limited recognition of specialized contributions negatively affected morale and trust.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All