employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Harvard Business Publishing

Engaged Employer

A company can be both good and bad depending on your manager - Director of Engineering Harvard Business Publishing Employee Review

2.0
Mar 11, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

1. Access to all articles and business cases published by Harvard. 2. Retirement benefits for older people (40+) are good. 3. Work-life balance.

Cons

1. HBP has started using third-party platforms for hosting content, so there is not much new development work for engineers. 2. Growth can be slow for some. 3. Your experience depends upon your manager. I had an awesome six years and horrible two years. 4. HR needs a total overhaul. 5. CIO runs the department as his own business, and there was a rumor that some senior directors do his house chores. 6. Random firing by the CIO.

avatar
Harvard Business Publishing Response
3y
We regret that your feedback came after your tenure with us ended; we read your post and wish we had the opportunity to learn more. We were pleased, however, to see that your experiences had pros, not just cons. We take all concerns seriously and will take a deeper look at the ones you have lifted. Thank you for taking the time to share, and if you are willing to engage with us further, please reach out at HR@harvardbusiness.org. Your email will reach my inbox directly, and as the CHRO of HBP, I am committed to learning what more we can do to improve the employee journey.

Explore other reviews about Harvard Business Publishing

5.0
May 13, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good Values Work Life Balance Innovative Cross-Collaboration

Cons

Lots of Change Some areas of silos

1.0
Jun 30, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good work/life balance Benefits are excellent

Cons

Mismanaged by basically all levels of leadership so that they can’t keep good talent onboard (turnover is abundant), accompanied by yearly lay-offs, so it’s very hard to find stability in any form. For a relatively smaller sized company, the amount of reorgs and team shuffling that occurs is alarming. This instability continues within the workflow processes, which are basically nonexistent—it’s all dependent on which member of leadership you’re talking to and when, and cross-functional teams don’t seem to be on the same page most of the time. But that’s probably because organizational standards change on an almost weekly basis with no true communication, enablement, or follow-up enforcement—creating a toxic cycle for all. Employees are targeted and singled out depending on leadership’s current moods, and when formal issues are brought to HR, there is no resolve—only understanding nods with no real recourse. Because let’s be honest, HR is stuck in the same toxic cycle as everyone else. If anything, this job has set me back in my career due to the dysfunctional way of working that is the forced norm at this organization, and I don’t foresee that changing as long as the executive leaders stay planted where they are. There is a general lack of innovation or forward-thinking with each business decision that’s made. Overall, this place is truly a waste of time for those looking to strengthen and build their careers. You’ve been warned.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All