employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Harvard University

Is this your company?

Meaningful Work Supporting Harvard College Students - Development Assistant Harvard University Employee Review

4.0
Jan 5, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

This role supports frontline fundraisers in the Faculty of Arts & Sciences with a focus on Harvard College students. The mission, colleagueship, and the university president’s efforts are overall highly valued. Colleagues can be described as skilled, supportive, and approachable. The position also benefits from being part of a union.

Cons

It’s a fast‑paced environment, and things can become hectic when negative media headlines spark sudden surges in workload. Opportunities for Development Assistants to advance internally are limited. Most move into a coordinator position or shift over to Operations. Earning an Assistant Director role or higher is difficult, even with long tenure.

Explore other reviews about Harvard University

5.0
Jul 13, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Light work if you have the right team

Cons

Low pay for amount of work

2.0
Jun 30, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great Union and benefits for non-profits/higher ed. Wonderful colleagues outside of leadership!

Cons

GSD Development and Alumni Relations (under current leadership) is an incredibly toxic work environment. I didn't realize the intensity of the toll it took on my until after leaving, and I am not one to leave a negative review, but as they are hiring for several positions currently, I wish to share words of caution with applicants. Cons: - Absolutely not a safe space for anyone who is Black, brown, trans, queer, working-class, or disabled - 100% top-down direction. No room for personal exploration, initiative, or creativity. - Minimal guidance from leadership - Frequent pivots, even in the late stages of projects - Petty, immature talking behind your back by leadership - No upward mobility unless the Associate Dean or Dean like you - Deeply disingenuous comments, reflections, and feedback from leadership - Complete lack of transparency on direction, goals, etc. - Small mistakes are made cornerstones of performance evaluations, while leadership routinely missteps. Leadership never takes accountability. - Top-down policy decisions, completely lacking detail, thought, and care outside of legal ramifications - Ever-changing in-office requirements

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All