employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Harvard University

Is this your company?

Good while you're there, but no chance to stay - Athletics Intern Harvard University Employee Review

4.0
Dec 28, 2009
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The name obviously makes a huge difference. I was in athletics, and the people there are good people, not stuck up or arrogant, and are definitely willing to help. Great life with coworkers outside of the office. Access to workout facilities, other parts of the school.

Cons

Pay was ok for an intern, but you end up working 60-70 hours, and even though they say there's overtime pay, you don't get any. No chance to stay after the internship is done. Not much professional development- you're basically put right to work. Season never ends there.

Explore other reviews about Harvard University

5.0
Jul 13, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Light work if you have the right team

Cons

Low pay for amount of work

2.0
Jun 30, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great Union and benefits for non-profits/higher ed. Wonderful colleagues outside of leadership!

Cons

GSD Development and Alumni Relations (under current leadership) is an incredibly toxic work environment. I didn't realize the intensity of the toll it took on my until after leaving, and I am not one to leave a negative review, but as they are hiring for several positions currently, I wish to share words of caution with applicants. Cons: - Absolutely not a safe space for anyone who is Black, brown, trans, queer, working-class, or disabled - 100% top-down direction. No room for personal exploration, initiative, or creativity. - Minimal guidance from leadership - Frequent pivots, even in the late stages of projects - Petty, immature talking behind your back by leadership - No upward mobility unless the Associate Dean or Dean like you - Deeply disingenuous comments, reflections, and feedback from leadership - Complete lack of transparency on direction, goals, etc. - Small mistakes are made cornerstones of performance evaluations, while leadership routinely missteps. Leadership never takes accountability. - Top-down policy decisions, completely lacking detail, thought, and care outside of legal ramifications - Ever-changing in-office requirements

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All