employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Harvard University

Is this your company?

Interesting Work, Poor Pay - Research Assistant Harvard University Employee Review

3.0
Feb 4, 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Interesting research and bright people.

Cons

While the people at Harvard are very bright and the work is interesting, the institution is not ideal. Harvard attracts people who are looking for cutting edge research experience and who need the Harvard brand name to continue on in their own pursuits. Therefore, Harvard knows that it can pay entry level researchers badly and still retain top talent. For instance, my research team has structured my pay so that they can avoid paying me benefits. This means that I cycle between two pay periods--90 days in which I work for 35 hours a week and then 60 days in which I work 17 hours a week. This allows them to classify me as "less than part time" in order to pay me less and avoid providing me benefits. The result is that I make less on an annualized basis than I would make flipping burgers at McDonalds for 40 hours a week, especially when the health insurance benefits from McDonalds are factored in. This creates a situation in which young people of means can afford to be research assistants while young people who do not have family backing must find other work. Harvard's union is supposed to be fixing this problem, but they are worthless and do not have the employee's interests at heart. I cannot wait until I find a position elsewhere where I am paid better and can live a more normal life financially.

Explore other reviews about Harvard University

5.0
Jul 10, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Excellent infrastructure, people, breathtaking resources

Cons

None, really. Wish they offered 2 year postdocs at the MHC

2.0
Jun 30, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great Union and benefits for non-profits/higher ed. Wonderful colleagues outside of leadership!

Cons

GSD Development and Alumni Relations (under current leadership) is an incredibly toxic work environment. I didn't realize the intensity of the toll it took on my until after leaving, and I am not one to leave a negative review, but as they are hiring for several positions currently, I wish to share words of caution with applicants. Cons: - Absolutely not a safe space for anyone who is Black, brown, trans, queer, working-class, or disabled - 100% top-down direction. No room for personal exploration, initiative, or creativity. - Minimal guidance from leadership - Frequent pivots, even in the late stages of projects - Petty, immature talking behind your back by leadership - No upward mobility unless the Associate Dean or Dean like you - Deeply disingenuous comments, reflections, and feedback from leadership - Complete lack of transparency on direction, goals, etc. - Small mistakes are made cornerstones of performance evaluations, while leadership routinely missteps. Leadership never takes accountability. - Top-down policy decisions, completely lacking detail, thought, and care outside of legal ramifications - Ever-changing in-office requirements

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All