Poorly Run - Senior Software Developer HealthEquity Inc. Employee Review

2.0
Mar 30, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

* Remote work, if that's your thing. * Work/life balance was good for me personally, but I think this really varies by your org and how reasonable your manager is. I know of other teams where this is absolutely not the case.

Cons

I started this job working for a small company, and we were acquired by HealthEquity in 2021. In a scant two years, they have completely run the product and the team into the ground. Understandably, I don't have much good to say about them. * Jon Kessler (President and CEO) does not believe in cost-of-living adjustments. At every single company meeting, an employee asks about COLA, and every single time he either explains what merit raises are or ignores the question. At a recent meeting, multiple employees commented that they couldn't afford to keep working solely at HealthEquity and were forced to take a second job. * Lack of communication about business and product decisions from upper management. We had a fun all-hands where the CTO (Eli) repeatedly said "we don't have communication problems, what are you talking about", then argued in the comments with people who were brave enough to provide examples. Employees are routinely not added to email lists they should be on, and product expectations and direction seem to be mysteries. * Extreme technology problems. As a software developer, I expect to have my computer and codebase completely set up within a week, and it's usually within a few days. Every single developer who joined my team post-acquisition was not able to run the site locally and commit code for 3-4 weeks. A few times our permissions were revoked seemingly randomly, so any issue I had, I needed to ask myself "is there something wrong with my computer, or did IT change something again?". There was one aspect of our development that could be done two ways (using an emulator or using a sandbox environment). One was clearly more efficient, but we just could not get the IT permissions sorted out for the team, even with multiple managers weighing in. I just gave up asking about it after a year. * An over-reliance on contractors, many of whom my team did not even get to interview before the position was offered to them. Some of them are alright, but some are absolutely not performing well in the role, and there is no recourse. If there is any kind of review system to help (or let go of) the poor performers, I haven't heard of it, they just stay on forever. * Relentless acquisition of competitors, leading to devoting lots of time to merging said acquisitions with the main product. * The company has a very "drink the Kool-Aid" type of culture. If you're into that, it might be exciting? I found it extremely off-putting.

avatar
HealthEquity Inc. Response
3y
Thank you for leaving a review of HealthEquity. We place high priority on work life balance and our remote policy provides a great atmosphere for team members to be successful in that. Our finance team ensures that our compensation packages are competitive and fair relative to the current market standards and similar positions. We appreciate your feedback and are always looking for ways to improve our team member experience. We will communicate this feedback to our leaders. We hope you took the time to express any concerns to your people business partner before your departure. Thank you for your contributions.

Explore other reviews about HealthEquity Inc.

5.0
Jun 30, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Mission, growth trajectory, work alongside good humans, constantly growing and developing.

Cons

Remote environment. Need to find opportunities to informally get to know your colleagues.

1.0
Apr 23, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Benefits, perks, remote work, unlimited PTO, and stock options.

Cons

Unfortunately, what has happened with most companies that grow too fast has occurred here. Too much focus on sales and marketing, and diminished focus on retaining clients or making sure new technology and processes are properly trained. Because of miscommunication and a lack of training, it's impossible to get help from other departments without a ton of pushback. Management would rather blame employees for problems than examine why processes aren't working properly. They now want all roles to sell product, even though that is not in their job descriptions. I wish HR would be more involved in how management speaks to employees because it's incredibly unethical and problematic every time we have a meeting. Whoever the C-suite is listening to on how to be good leaders should be fired, because they are taking a page out of every toxic workplace stereotype, instead of looking at how things can be ethically and properly fixed. There is no focus on clients or employees anymore, just getting more money.

5
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All