employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Humane World for Animals

Engaged Employer

Sexist, confused and old-fashioned management - Anonymous employee Humane World for Animals Employee Review

1.0
Nov 4, 2015
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

They do great work for animals and many employees are a joy to work with --dedicated, kind, super smart, funny.

Cons

Management is a confused mess. Employees work very long hours with high stress and low pay, and little help from management. Constant drama and infighting. HSUS is run by a small group of rich straight white men who do not like women. Their leadership webpage is encouraging, with lots of female faces, but when you work at HSUS you learn that any females in management are ignored or even harassed. High turnover. The CEO makes over $300,000 but can't stand to hire even a cheap temp position to help with the constant overtime hours. Work doesn't get done, managers have so many people reporting to them they have no idea what's going on, and leadership (all white men) want nothing to do with employee feedback. The internal employee moral surveys get worse every year. Women are not promoted, not invited to meetings, laughed at, and worse...HSUS has a robust history of sexual harassment lawsuits. Perhaps the best way to sum it up: Female employees are expected to attend company functions to talk to donors. This involves weekend and evening work, of course. They have to pay for their own meal. Not making that up. An employee is expected to give up a Friday or Saturday night to schmooze donors (including donors with a history of rape accusations, sexual harassment, etc) and then pay HSUS for the meal. Management has zero interest or ability in handling gender or race diversity or equality issues, pay equity, sexual harassment, massive overtime, or projects not getting done. Leadership will often demand more work of employees already maxed out, and employees know it's best to just agree. But the work never gets done, and that's bad for the cause. Lots of employee complaining and frustrations which makes it hard to stay positive. If you can survive a couple of years it will look good on your resume but I recommend starting the job with low expectations. And if you're female--be careful!

avatar
Humane World for Animals Response
10y
Thank you for your posting. You mention a number of topics in this post, some of which can be addressed here. • The HSUS has a workforce primarily comprised of women and the demographics of our staff managers are fairly consistent with that breakout--about 75% female and 25% male. Over the past four years, nearly 80% of all staff promotions were for females, and 67% of those promoted to a Vice President or Senior Vice President level position were females. We believe that’s a pretty good track record. The level and scope of a manager’s authority and decision-making at The HSUS is contingent upon the individual’s role, accountability, and performance. It is not based on gender. • Our all-volunteer Board of Directors is currently made up of 29 members, almost evenly split between men and women (15 and 14, respectively). The immediate past Chair of the Board, and the current Vice Chair, are both women. These volunteer Directors are the individuals who set policy for the organization, and oversee the performance and compensation of executives and officers. • We are a mission-based organization, with a fast-paced campaigning style of work, and that is not necessarily for everyone. We have some jobs—which given the nature of their role—do have responsibilities that require those in them to work outside the normal business hours, i.e. evenings and weekends. Our fundraising; outreach and engagement; legislative and grassroots; rescue and response; direct animal care; and campaigns and advocacy-related roles often can be called upon to support events and activities during these off hours. We appreciate the time and efforts given by the staff in these positions and, when possible provide flex time and/or time-off to allow them the opportunity to balance their work requirements with time to refresh and rejuvenate. We also provide other benefits such as paid pet sitting for employees who are required to travel for work. In addition, many staff are able to telecommute some days during the workweek, dependent on the type of work they perform, and this provides a break from the expectation of them being in the office every day. • As an organization that is funded by donor dollars, we are committed to ensuring that we are using these funds in the most prudent and fiscally responsible way. Whether or not we fill a position, hire a temporary, require an employee to pay to voluntarily attend an event at which he/she is not required to work, or make any other spending decisions, we make them giving consideration to the impact they may have on our staff, as well as on our budget and our overall operations. Like all non-profit organizations, we often have to make hard decisions about how our spending is allocated, with finite resources and an unlimited number of worthy projects and positions to fund. • Our full-year turnover rate for 2015 is not yet available. Last year’s (2014) turnover rate was 13.9%, which was a decrease of 2% from 2013’s rate. This was below the non-profit trend for 2014 of 15%. Finally, you mention a number of issues related to harassment, equality, equity and diversity. Our employee handbook covers these in several of our HSUS policies (EEO Policy; Policy Against Sexual and Other Kinds of Harassment) and provides a complaint process. You are encouraged to contact the Human Resources department regarding these and any other concerns you may have.

Explore other reviews about Humane World for Animals

5.0
Jun 16, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Everything they are amazing people

Cons

None they are great at what they do

3.0
May 7, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The mission - of course. Remote work Benefits are decent

Cons

Favoritism - people get promoted because they are friends with someone or because they are appropriately performative. Inept leadership - Very few of the people managers know how to manage people and/or business process. No strategic leadership - we have a mission, but the strategy doesn't trickle down to those doing the work. Siloed - Departments don't work together. It is common for other departments or even individuals in your own department to sabotage or undermine your work. Zero transparency - The Board is a mysterious entity that no one understands. C Suite doesn't communicate down. The C suite itself doesn't work with its members. Everyone is doing their own thing. C suite is disconnected from the real work. The C-suite micromanages and discounts the expertise of its team. Operationally deficient - very few business processes, no clear roles and responsibilities, top heavy, slow to no decision-making. My concerned with performative measures and optics.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All