Had Potential But Squandered It - Anonymous employee InMobi Employee Review

2.0
Jan 17, 2014
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Once there was true passion and drive amongst the employees. Very lenient organization in some ways. You will be well paid and can work as much as you want to. Free food, well located offices, opportunity to see the world on the company dime.

Cons

The long and short of it is that the leadership team "tries" to lead by trial and error. The founders/ management team are seriously out of their depth. Any talent/ voice of reason that was there has left or is on their way out. Accountability does not exist for the "inner circle". There are a bunch of people in the senior team/ management who have never delivered but continue to thrive. Even the folks that they have brought in to lead HR and other functions recently are an absolute joke (as echoed in other reviews as well). Performance management is a farce. Its not surprising that a company of this size is so political with so many people trying to protect their turf/ image. There are some people at the top who are absolute geniuses at making others' work look like their own and the number of "yes men" the founders have surrounded themselves with is discomforting (but quite obvious). The people who get slaughtered are those who voice their dissent and the poor engineers who are made to run around while the leadership team tries to figure out the next big idea. Failed efforts are conveniently forgotten never to be talked about again without any analysis of why they failed. Overall extremely political and CYA environment.

Explore other reviews about InMobi

5.0
Apr 5, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

They do look out for you financially and hitting goals (roughly) each quarter, well respected among leadership, like the people I work with

Cons

You definitely have to be a self starter and good at working in a place with many changes fast

1.0
Dec 12, 2025
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Colleagues were smart, collaborative, and supportive. They made the day-to-day challenges more manageable and and always willing to help each other succeed. - Daily lunches in the office were a nice perk and helped reduce personal expenses. - Competitive pay. Decent benefits.

Cons

- Performance management processes are frequently applied inconsistently and without clear intent to develop or support employees. Rather than fostering growth or providing actionable coaching, the process is often used as a tactic to manage people out, particularly when accommodations or personal advocacy are involved. - Leadership sometimes promotes a culture of control over collaboration. New managers can come in and assert authority without first understanding team dynamics, established workflows, or communication norms. This creates unnecessary friction, mistrust, and dysfunction. - Micromanagement and punitive practices are often disguised as professional development, but lack true coaching or mentorship. Issues like formatting or phrasing are escalated to HR-level concerns, while real systemic problems go unaddressed. Employees who speak up or ask clarifying questions are often penalized instead of supported. - Employees returning from medical leave are especially vulnerable. Instead of creating a supportive reintegration plan, some leaders choose to document routine issues as performance failures, ignoring broader context. This feels retaliatory and designed to build a paper trail rather than help employees succeed. - HR does not function as an impartial resource. Employee concerns are routinely brushed aside, and when legal risks arise (ex: related to medical disclosures), severance and extended benefits are offered as a way to avoid potential claims, not as a gesture of goodwill. - Leadership culture is rooted in fear and internal politics. Decisions often appear politically motivated, prioritizing optics over ethics or accountability. - Some managers lack proficiency in basic tools (e.g., Excel, Teams, reporting systems), but still micromanage and penalize employees for unclear or minor issues. - In-office policy is inconsistent and unfair. Employees are expected to be in the office five days a week while others, including some senior leaders, work fully remote. This undermines morale and eliminates flexibility. - Career development is stagnant. There is no mentorship culture, no clear growth path, and performance feedback is often vague or retroactive. - Systems and tools break frequently with little urgency to fix them. Internal processes are clunky, reporting is unreliable, and cross-functional collaboration is poor. Meetings often lack follow-through or leadership accountability. - Policies are not applied evenly, and there are legitimate concerns about how employee issues are handled. There is little trust in HR, and many decisions feel legally questionable or ethically troubling.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All