Worst company in the history of the world to work for - Software Engineer Contractor Entry Level Infosys Employee Review

1.0
Sep 13, 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Impossible to get fired There isn't really pros to this company, u might be able to get hired by them and put at a great company but this is because Infosys has no standards when hiring.

Cons

Pay culture benefits overworked employees communication issues terrible employee portal and unethical treatment to employees in regards to relocation and compensation to relocate and break leases My experience at this company was awful, my manager was so micromanagy that i was forced to look for other jobs, the pay was terrible, they pay 57k for a software engineer doning the job of a mid level engineer and offer a 3k raise after a year. that is a joke. also many of the people they hire are foreigners who have no choice but to work their buts off for this company, if they dont they risk deportation.

Explore other reviews about Infosys

5.0
Feb 27, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Management Resources Work life Balance

Cons

Pay and benefits could be better

4.0
Jun 10, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Job stability – Infosys is known for long-term employment and steady projects. Strong brand value – Having Infosys on your resume adds credibility and global recognition. Good learning opportunities – Access to internal learning platforms, certifications, and training programs (especially for freshers). Global exposure – Opportunities to work with international clients and global delivery teams. Structured processes – Well-defined policies, documentation, and governance. Work-life balance (project dependent) – Many teams offer reasonable working hours. Employee benefits – Health insurance, paid leaves, and wellness initiatives. Safe and inclusive workplace – Strong focus on ethics, compliance, and diversity.

Cons

Salary growth can be slow – Compensation increments may be lower compared to market standards. Limited flexibility in role changes – Internal mobility and project switches can take time. Bureaucratic processes – Decision-making can be slow due to multiple approval layers. Project allocation delays – Bench time and delayed onboarding to projects can happen. Variable learning exposure – Skill growth depends heavily on the project assigned. Less innovation in some teams – Certain projects may use legacy technologies. Onsite opportunities are limited – Compared to earlier years, onsite roles are fewer. Performance appraisal transparency – Rating systems may feel rigid or unclear.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All