Bad culture 2024 Review - Analyst Judi Health Employee Review

1.0
Jul 29, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

1. Fully remote 2. Good health insurance 3. I wish the CEO looked into this issue. We have some amazing talent here, but many are feeling burned out due to poor management and a toxic work culture. It's impacting morale and productivity.

Cons

- The micro-management approach limits employees' ability to contribute ideas or suggestions, stifling creativity and innovation. - The leadership lacks the technical and business knowledge necessary for effectively running a health tech company, which can lead to poor decision-making. - Many team members are depressed, and rude behavior from colleagues is not addressed, contributing to a toxic workplace culture. - There is no clear path for professional development, and hard work is not acknowledged or rewarded, which can lead to frustration and disengagement. - Employees' contributions are downplayed, and achievements are not recognized, which can demotivate even the most dedicated workers. - While town halls may present an optimistic view of the company's performance, this does not translate into tangible improvements in the workplace environment. - Average pay - Your manager insists on dictating every task, even when they are completed successfully, which can be demoralizing and hinder your autonomy.

Explore other reviews about Judi Health

5.0
Jul 21, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

-Career growth -Mentorship -Team engagement -Work-life balance -Transparency -Equity options

Cons

I haven't experienced any cons

1.0
Jul 7, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Not much positives while I was there.

Cons

Joining this company initially felt like a great opportunity, but it quickly became clear that the internal culture and leadership dynamics were deeply unhealthy. One of the most troubling things I experienced was bullying by tech leads who were closely aligned with upper leadership. I witnessed a tech lead, a Scrum Master, and a Product Manager coordinate to give poor performance reviews to an entire team — not based on merit, but seemingly to justify replacing the team with others they preferred. That team was dismantled and rebuilt multiple times, yet the individuals behind the dysfunction remained untouched due to their close ties with company leadership. Favoritism was widespread. Certain individuals were shielded from accountability because of personal relationships with executives, while others — even high performers — were unfairly targeted. Performance reviews were weaponized, with some given the power to evaluate others while never being evaluated themselves.

7
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All