Worth reading - Anonymous employee Judi Health Employee Review

2.0
May 19, 2025
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The Talent Acquisition and Learning & Development teams are exceptional—dedicated, knowledgeable, and truly supportive of employee growth. While there is a strong emphasis on hiring talent, some concerns arise in the retention and development of employees post-hire.

Cons

Abuse of a 90-Day probation period is used as a safety net for terrible interviewing and hiring processes. Compensation transparency is an ongoing issue. Base salaries often feel misaligned with market rates, and conflicting information exists regarding sign-on bonuses for managerial roles. After 1 year, they give a 2% 401k match. "Unlimited PTO" so there's no payout. The CHRO "left" and several VPs and Sr. Directors resigned because of frustration with the company. Leadership tends to prioritize individual influence over collaborative decision-making, which can create challenges in communication and improved workplace dynamics. HR’s approach to feedback is another concern. While employees are encouraged to share their perspectives, it does not always lead to meaningful change. Those who provide honest critiques may experience pushback, including Performance Improvement Plans (PIPs) or even early termination within the first 90 days. Additionally, exit interviews are deprioritized, and feedback from departing employees does not appear to be leveraged to enhance workplace culture. The culture is toxic and what's worse is when feedback for course correction is provided, they fire the one giving it. Psychological safety is non existent.

Explore other reviews about Judi Health

5.0
Jul 21, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

-Career growth -Mentorship -Team engagement -Work-life balance -Transparency -Equity options

Cons

I haven't experienced any cons

1.0
Jul 7, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Not much positives while I was there.

Cons

Joining this company initially felt like a great opportunity, but it quickly became clear that the internal culture and leadership dynamics were deeply unhealthy. One of the most troubling things I experienced was bullying by tech leads who were closely aligned with upper leadership. I witnessed a tech lead, a Scrum Master, and a Product Manager coordinate to give poor performance reviews to an entire team — not based on merit, but seemingly to justify replacing the team with others they preferred. That team was dismantled and rebuilt multiple times, yet the individuals behind the dysfunction remained untouched due to their close ties with company leadership. Favoritism was widespread. Certain individuals were shielded from accountability because of personal relationships with executives, while others — even high performers — were unfairly targeted. Performance reviews were weaponized, with some given the power to evaluate others while never being evaluated themselves.

7
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All