Toxic senior leadership in claims contact center - Great Potential and People Very Poor Management Kemper Employee Review

1.0
Oct 15, 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

FNOL and Express managers, supervisors, and trainers want to do the right thing and want to excel. Supportive coworkers. Good work life balance for FNOL reps. No overnight or weekend work for reps or adjusters. FNOL supervisors are always available for questions.

Cons

#1 con....The Claims Contact Center AVP. Directors are expected to work long hours and any day of the week because they are salaried employees. Low pay for employees promoted internally to manager or supervisor roles (frequently no increase in pay given, despite increased roles and responsibilities). FNOL Supervisors are expected to be on the phone long hours of the day setting up new losses and taking status calls (that is not our job!), while still doing supervisor responsibilities.

Explore other reviews about Kemper

5.0
Jun 3, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Solid work environment at Kemper

Cons

Pay is lower than what I would have liked

1.0
Jul 3, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Remote role, starting pay is $93k and the selection of benefits are great.

Cons

As an experienced major loss adjuster with decades in the industry, I found this to be one of the most heavily micromanaged claims environments I have worked in. In my experience, file management was closely monitored with significant emphasis on diary compliance, activity metrics, documentation, and "clicks," leaving little opportunity to focus on thoughtful claim handling. The expected inventory was communicated to be approximately 150 to 175 exposures, which I found difficult to reconcile with the level of investigation, litigation management, and customer service expected on complex claims. Despite hiring experienced adjusters, there was virtually no autonomy in managing files, and independent claim judgment was significantly limited by constant oversight and administrative metrics. Training did not adequately prepare new adjusters to navigate the company's proprietary software, numerous internal policies, and complex coverage determinations, including issues involving unlisted drivers, unlisted vehicles, and policy cancellations for non-payment of premium. I found the performance standards and metrics to be unrealistic given the workload and the level of training provided. Management communication was frequent and often disruptive. In my experience, there were regular interruptions throughout the workday by phone calls, Teams messages, emails, and redundant diary reminders, making it difficult to maintain focus on complex claims. Expectations regarding video calls were also inconsistent. I was initially told that my attire during unscheduled video calls was not a concern, but later instructed to dress professionally at all times because supervisors could initiate video calls without notice. Although the company emphasizes inclusion and employee support, my experience was that management's actions did not always align with those values. After raising concerns through HR regarding management, I was placed on a Performance Improvement Plan shortly thereafter and ultimately my employment ended. That was my personal experience, and prospective employees should consider it when evaluating the company's culture. This position may be a good fit for individuals who are comfortable working in a highly structured, metrics-driven environment with constant management oversight. However, if you value professional judgment, autonomy, consistent expectations, and the ability to independently manage complex claims, my experience suggests this may not be the right environment.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All