This place is not good for your career or mental health - Anonymous employee Klaviyo Employee Review

1.0
May 4, 2023
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Decent initial offer and fringe benefits. Most individual contributors are talented and kind, so you will have an opportunity to learn from them.

Cons

All the negative reviews in here are really true. When looking at reviews, filter them by the recent ones and you will notice a pattern. Most leaders are either power-tripping, do not care, biding time until market picks up for better opportunities or IPO, absolutely out of touch, incompetent to run a larger organization, yes-people or all the above. Sadly, this organization is an insult to all the people who joined to build something cool. Initially, it seemed like an open, honest, genuine and happy place of talented people. I am unsure if something changed as the organization grew or if the founders (and their egos) became more involved or if true systemic issues took time to surface or got triggered by growth. If you join this place, you will end up with no bonuses, inequitable or no raises or RSUs, broken promises of career growth, remote-unfriendliness, a façade of openness, sugar-coated answers, ever changing priorities, and an eventual feeling of being stuck with no respite. It may eventually change, but again, please do yourself a favor and look for the most recent reviews and trend

Explore other reviews about Klaviyo

5.0
Jul 6, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good benefits and office environment

Cons

Deep in Boston, but as long as you put in the work it's worth it

1.0
Apr 30, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Benefits, free food, tech talks.

Cons

I had high expectations coming into Klaviyo, but the reality fell far short. The biggest issue is leadership. There is a clear lack of the experience and judgment needed to effectively lead a modern engineering organization. Decision-making often feels reactive rather than strategic, and there’s little evidence of long-term technical vision. Instead of empowering experienced professionals, leadership tends to micromanage as if they’re overseeing a group of junior interns rather than seasoned engineers. From a technical standpoint, the quality of the codebase and product is concerning. Much of the system feels like a patchwork of rushed solutions—often reminiscent of a half-baked college project rather than a mature, production-grade platform. Core areas suffer from poor system design, weak data models, and significant technical debt that is consistently ignored rather than addressed. Project expectations are frequently unrealistic. Leadership pushes aggressive timelines without accounting for the underlying technical challenges or existing debt. There’s little regard for sustainable development practices, which leads to constant firefighting instead of building robust, scalable systems. The result is a frustrating environment where engineers spend more time working around problems than solving them properly. For a company at this stage, the gap between where things are and where they should be is hard to overlook.

7
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All