so disappointing! - Anonymous employee Klaviyo Employee Review

1.0
May 24, 2023
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Flexible "unlimited" time-off Decent salary Great ICs - smart, sincere, hard-working Product makes marketers happy and effective

Cons

CEO lacks desirable leadership qualities and promotes burnout culture. After touting how in-person work is the future and bringing the entire marketing org together for a week in Boston he stopped in (under duress it seemed) to see the group for about 90 seconds and had almost nothing to say to us, did not try to connect with people, did not attend team events. Every time he speaks at a town hall we were left with feelings of certainty about direction - the only thing you leave with is a feeling that you need to keep working harder/more/longer (to what end I am not sure), that instead of celebrating and acknowledging good work and people its more valuable to pick it/them apart and find flaws and blame. Layoffs came on the heels of super positive performance reviews, coupled with lackluster or zero pay raises - with high inflation it was a pay cut. IPO readiness is the only thing they seem to be even remotely interest in being ready for. Lack of prioritization despite ad nauseam talk and hollow promises about doing less to focus more. Chaotically and constantly shifting priorities leaving employees with a feeling of whiplash and wasting time/effort switching from one thing to the next.

Explore other reviews about Klaviyo

5.0
Jul 6, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good benefits and office environment

Cons

Deep in Boston, but as long as you put in the work it's worth it

1.0
Apr 30, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Benefits, free food, tech talks.

Cons

I had high expectations coming into Klaviyo, but the reality fell far short. The biggest issue is leadership. There is a clear lack of the experience and judgment needed to effectively lead a modern engineering organization. Decision-making often feels reactive rather than strategic, and there’s little evidence of long-term technical vision. Instead of empowering experienced professionals, leadership tends to micromanage as if they’re overseeing a group of junior interns rather than seasoned engineers. From a technical standpoint, the quality of the codebase and product is concerning. Much of the system feels like a patchwork of rushed solutions—often reminiscent of a half-baked college project rather than a mature, production-grade platform. Core areas suffer from poor system design, weak data models, and significant technical debt that is consistently ignored rather than addressed. Project expectations are frequently unrealistic. Leadership pushes aggressive timelines without accounting for the underlying technical challenges or existing debt. There’s little regard for sustainable development practices, which leads to constant firefighting instead of building robust, scalable systems. The result is a frustrating environment where engineers spend more time working around problems than solving them properly. For a company at this stage, the gap between where things are and where they should be is hard to overlook.

7
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All