A sad story of poor leadership - Account Executive Klaviyo Employee Review

2.0
Feb 14, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Awesome people, great product, above average benefits. That’s what gets the 2 stars.

Cons

Klaviyo is easily the most toxic culture I have ever worked at. What used to be an amazing “all in” culture has slowly shifted to a politics-driven, burnout heavy, and ‘dodge any responsibility and delegate’ culture. It’s amazing how things can change in two years, let alone, one. A place that had so many people loving their jobs is now a complaint-driven and depressing place to be. (I do want to make note that many orgs still love it- just not sales.) The entire GTM org is all over the place since Steve Rowland joined. He is doing what he did at OKTA and had to publicly step down for. It is the Steve show and all he cares about is collecting his bonus and working everyone to the bone. The SVP of sales is not far away from him and still doesn’t realize that he has lost the whole sales org. If he could spend the rest of his time at klaviyo not interacting with an AE, he would- he wants nothing to do with the sales org and wants so badly to be included by the C-Suite. GTM Ops is a mess that can’t deliver on any of their promises and constantly has new leaders in and out the door. A delayed project is the norm for them. Sales VPs can’t stand each other. Sales managers barely know what they are doing. And yet- this all stems from the top. AB created this culture of micromanagement, changing directions, poor rollouts of products, favoritism, and going back on his word. So it make sense that the rest of the company follows suit. I would be sure to research which org you are joining, because for the most part- sales is bad.

Explore other reviews about Klaviyo

5.0
Jul 6, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good benefits and office environment

Cons

Deep in Boston, but as long as you put in the work it's worth it

1.0
Apr 30, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Benefits, free food, tech talks.

Cons

I had high expectations coming into Klaviyo, but the reality fell far short. The biggest issue is leadership. There is a clear lack of the experience and judgment needed to effectively lead a modern engineering organization. Decision-making often feels reactive rather than strategic, and there’s little evidence of long-term technical vision. Instead of empowering experienced professionals, leadership tends to micromanage as if they’re overseeing a group of junior interns rather than seasoned engineers. From a technical standpoint, the quality of the codebase and product is concerning. Much of the system feels like a patchwork of rushed solutions—often reminiscent of a half-baked college project rather than a mature, production-grade platform. Core areas suffer from poor system design, weak data models, and significant technical debt that is consistently ignored rather than addressed. Project expectations are frequently unrealistic. Leadership pushes aggressive timelines without accounting for the underlying technical challenges or existing debt. There’s little regard for sustainable development practices, which leads to constant firefighting instead of building robust, scalable systems. The result is a frustrating environment where engineers spend more time working around problems than solving them properly. For a company at this stage, the gap between where things are and where they should be is hard to overlook.

7
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All