Shhhhhhh - Senior Software Engineer Klaviyo Employee Review

2.0
Jan 7, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Some fun projects and some great coworkers.

Cons

Leadership shutting down conversation about benefit cuts was the moment the culture died for me. People were having an open discussion in an off topic channel, asking questions and sharing feelings about benefit cuts that had been shared in a poorly worded email 2 days before taking effect. None of the comments crossed the line or were in any way unprofessional. They were discussions about benefits and work conditions, but because there was a layer of negativity (as there would be with any TC cut) leadership got uncomfortable and went to peoples managers to stop the conversation. Over my time here there have been a lot of decisions I disagreed with, but could live with and commit to. This is different, for the first time I am ashamed to work here.

Explore other reviews about Klaviyo

5.0
Jul 6, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good benefits and office environment

Cons

Deep in Boston, but as long as you put in the work it's worth it

1.0
Apr 30, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Benefits, free food, tech talks.

Cons

I had high expectations coming into Klaviyo, but the reality fell far short. The biggest issue is leadership. There is a clear lack of the experience and judgment needed to effectively lead a modern engineering organization. Decision-making often feels reactive rather than strategic, and there’s little evidence of long-term technical vision. Instead of empowering experienced professionals, leadership tends to micromanage as if they’re overseeing a group of junior interns rather than seasoned engineers. From a technical standpoint, the quality of the codebase and product is concerning. Much of the system feels like a patchwork of rushed solutions—often reminiscent of a half-baked college project rather than a mature, production-grade platform. Core areas suffer from poor system design, weak data models, and significant technical debt that is consistently ignored rather than addressed. Project expectations are frequently unrealistic. Leadership pushes aggressive timelines without accounting for the underlying technical challenges or existing debt. There’s little regard for sustainable development practices, which leads to constant firefighting instead of building robust, scalable systems. The result is a frustrating environment where engineers spend more time working around problems than solving them properly. For a company at this stage, the gap between where things are and where they should be is hard to overlook.

7
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All