Great Steady Company with Good Benefits - Cybersecurity Architect L3Harris Employee Review

5.0
Oct 30, 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Stable large company with a long history (of Harris and L3) in the A&D Industry. Good health benefits, great 401k, engaging work, clear expectations, and identified path for advancement.

Cons

Large company with slow advancement, new opportunities for promotion are dependent on positions opening (which isn't common), health benefits continue to increase in cost but offer less (industry-wide problem), culture is dependent on your business segment.

avatar
L3Harris Response
5y
Thanks for your review; we're glad you like our benefits offerings. Please reach out to your HR Business Partner to find ways to incorporate the Career Framework into your career path. This will help set you up for success as you advance further with us. Also, we're building upon our listening strategy and working with managers and senior leaders to further communicate across levels and segments to ensure we are aligned to continuously improve and innovate into the upcoming year and beyond. We appreciate your feedback!

Explore other reviews about L3Harris

5.0
Jul 9, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Passionate people - Lots of work - Open to new implementation

Cons

- Ladder climb is a bit unstructured.

2.0
Jun 5, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Missions are impactful to the world Top talent in specialized fields Wonderful people Respectful environment

Cons

Processes and policies are not robust enough to support the large growth / merger, which leaves everyone operating in silos and interpreting things in their own ways Shared service model is not structured properly Not enough critical thinking around how budgets should be allocated for tools, capital, and salaries Higher level leaders are too in the weeds and not working on the harder strategic aspects Businesses are not aligned with common products to gain best synergies as all businesses fight to defend $s not what actually makes sense for the company (radios sharing same suppliers are in completely different segments; CCAs are built across 10+ different factories managed by different management teams instead of a couple of large COEs) All leaders felt unempowered due to lack of ownership of budgets. Budgets were set but then adjusted at further levels without any additional discussion of new targets and how to achieve. Then budgets would be reallocated a few months into year if you weren't demonstrating that you truly need it. This drove teams to spend heavy up front and not make the smartest decisions at times

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All