HR and Engineering detached from realities of projects - Engineer L3Harris Employee Review

2.0
Sep 4, 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great work with great customers. Great coworkers--few remaining, mostly demoralized.

Cons

People with authority are nowhere near the work to be able to make the right decisions for projects, relying on condensed information that flows up and is not necessarily complete. Hiring/retention and promotions don't reflect the realities of the project execution. We don't get the people we need and people who do negative work are treated the same as those that carry projects across the finish line. When good people quit HR will satisfy any demand, including promotion, even if it doesn't make sense for the projects, even when they're telling others "you have to do XYZ" to get promoted. XYZ adds NO value to the customer by the way. Many cases of essential employees compensated less than people that were ready to walk away. Good ol boy behavior persists in some functions and is tolerated by the company, that's how you know all these diversity initiatives are meaningless. HR recently said that people should start a dialog before they submit a resignation but there is no evidence that helps you and it probably helps people prepare the spin they'll have to disseminate. Truly sad to see that management will let entire portfolios die rather than try to do what makes sense, which often times is simply to collaborate with people who really know how to do the work.

Explore other reviews about L3Harris

5.0
Apr 6, 2026
Anonymous intern
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The manager was very nice, but also made sure I was learning.

Cons

The workplace was old and outdated.

2.0
Jun 5, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Missions are impactful to the world Top talent in specialized fields Wonderful people Respectful environment

Cons

Processes and policies are not robust enough to support the large growth / merger, which leaves everyone operating in silos and interpreting things in their own ways Shared service model is not structured properly Not enough critical thinking around how budgets should be allocated for tools, capital, and salaries Higher level leaders are too in the weeds and not working on the harder strategic aspects Businesses are not aligned with common products to gain best synergies as all businesses fight to defend $s not what actually makes sense for the company (radios sharing same suppliers are in completely different segments; CCAs are built across 10+ different factories managed by different management teams instead of a couple of large COEs) All leaders felt unempowered due to lack of ownership of budgets. Budgets were set but then adjusted at further levels without any additional discussion of new targets and how to achieve. Then budgets would be reallocated a few months into year if you weren't demonstrating that you truly need it. This drove teams to spend heavy up front and not make the smartest decisions at times

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All