Management is TRASH - Program Analyst Leidos Employee Review

1.0
Aug 2, 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

There are great places to walk around. There is free coffee - when management feels like replenishing the cabinets You can learn alot from people who are willing to share information from you. Upper management does not know anyone by name, HR does not speak to you in the hallways but they can try to help you by copy pasting this off of the intranet sites. Corporate and Contract are very distinctly different Corporate does not associate with Contract employees in the same way.

Cons

Management is shut lipped about things that happen. Clients are given upper hand and management caters to them and not their own employees who actually do the work. STAY away from EOSH and NISC III Contract. Management does not communicate their schedules or work schedules to people who need to know where they are. Rules are are expected to be enforced by Program Analyst or Assistants. There a lot of disgruntled employees here and a very high turnover rate. Commuter incentive program only allows for $120 taxed reimbursement. Telework days are not given to all employees. Favoritism is shown to people who have client that generate the most revenue or that bring in the most business - During The shutdown - people were forced to use vacation hours that they did not even accrue - causing madness for 5 months because everyone that was hired is new

Explore other reviews about Leidos

5.0
May 7, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Large companies. Willingness to work with you.

Cons

Low paying. No hybrid opportunity

3.0
May 27, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Leidos provides opportunities to work on complex government programs with meaningful technical challenges. Depending on the contract and team, there can be exposure to cloud infrastructure, cybersecurity, systems engineering, networking, and mission-focused work that is difficult to find elsewhere. The company also has a large footprint, so there may be internal opportunities for people who are able to navigate the organization.

Cons

My experience was that the quality of management varied significantly by program. Communication around expectations, roles, and priorities was often inconsistent, and decisions that affected employees were not always explained clearly or handled in a transparent way. Work-life balance also depended heavily on local management. Flexibility that existed in practice could be changed quickly, and employees were sometimes left trying to reconcile changing expectations with existing workloads and personal obligations. In my view, the company would benefit from stronger oversight of program-level management decisions, especially where employee responsibilities, workplace flexibility, and performance feedback are concerned. I also found that technical decision-making was sometimes driven more by schedule pressure than by sound engineering judgment. On complex government programs, that can create unnecessary risk and frustration for employees who are trying to do things correctly.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All