Dissapointing - Anonymous employee Leidos Employee Review

2.0
Apr 30, 2014
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

A nice variety of careers available, hire a lot of veterans.

Cons

Management is horrible. I've worked here long enough, and it's always the same story: it's all about who you know, and how much you suck up to the supervisors. I've seen employees get promoted that were absolutely horrible at their job, meanwhile, hard-working, very knowledgeable, employees such as myself get looked over. The pay here is a joke. They lay off large amounts of employees and then create service centers where the employees have no experience, call it a "entry level position", and pay you 1/3rd of what the former employees were making. The company just recently went through a split and it seems anyone who got stuck on the side of Leidos got the raw deal. Unless you personally know your management team outside of work BEFORE starting here, or you don't mind sucking up every day, don't bother. They claim to reimburse you for higher learning, and yet, they seem to be always tight on funds to the point where they can't even buy basic office supplies anymore. 0-1% raises are what you can expect each year, with the same excuse "we can't afford it this year". This is a multi-billion dollar company...

Explore other reviews about Leidos

5.0
Jun 22, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Ability to work from home

Cons

There is few opportunities to promote

3.0
May 27, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Leidos provides opportunities to work on complex government programs with meaningful technical challenges. Depending on the contract and team, there can be exposure to cloud infrastructure, cybersecurity, systems engineering, networking, and mission-focused work that is difficult to find elsewhere. The company also has a large footprint, so there may be internal opportunities for people who are able to navigate the organization.

Cons

My experience was that the quality of management varied significantly by program. Communication around expectations, roles, and priorities was often inconsistent, and decisions that affected employees were not always explained clearly or handled in a transparent way. Work-life balance also depended heavily on local management. Flexibility that existed in practice could be changed quickly, and employees were sometimes left trying to reconcile changing expectations with existing workloads and personal obligations. In my view, the company would benefit from stronger oversight of program-level management decisions, especially where employee responsibilities, workplace flexibility, and performance feedback are concerned. I also found that technical decision-making was sometimes driven more by schedule pressure than by sound engineering judgment. On complex government programs, that can create unnecessary risk and frustration for employees who are trying to do things correctly.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All