One Sad Experience - Senior Consultant Leidos Employee Review

1.0
Feb 5, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I'm not sure there are any!!!

Cons

1. You are an expendable micro-serf from day 1! You mean nothing and are not valued at all. It's all about the bonuses for the C-suite. 2. Top VP's, Directors, Project Managers and Senior Analysts are leaving in droves. 3. They lie to you about upcoming engagements. Engagements are getting shorter and they are paying less and less per hour. 4. Leidos Health spin off from SAIC was a half-baked acquisition which allowed Leidos to be formed in order to score the MUS funding. Brand is so diluted now that no one knows who they are in Health IT. 5. Leidos Health C-suite expects all of their directors to pull in the same revenues as their military consulting division which will never happen. 6. Leidos Health directors are as slimy as it gets when it comes to making promises that will never materialize. 7. Do not work for these clowns!

Explore other reviews about Leidos

5.0
May 21, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great benefits and career pathing

Cons

No cons that I can think of

3.0
May 27, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Leidos provides opportunities to work on complex government programs with meaningful technical challenges. Depending on the contract and team, there can be exposure to cloud infrastructure, cybersecurity, systems engineering, networking, and mission-focused work that is difficult to find elsewhere. The company also has a large footprint, so there may be internal opportunities for people who are able to navigate the organization.

Cons

My experience was that the quality of management varied significantly by program. Communication around expectations, roles, and priorities was often inconsistent, and decisions that affected employees were not always explained clearly or handled in a transparent way. Work-life balance also depended heavily on local management. Flexibility that existed in practice could be changed quickly, and employees were sometimes left trying to reconcile changing expectations with existing workloads and personal obligations. In my view, the company would benefit from stronger oversight of program-level management decisions, especially where employee responsibilities, workplace flexibility, and performance feedback are concerned. I also found that technical decision-making was sometimes driven more by schedule pressure than by sound engineering judgment. On complex government programs, that can create unnecessary risk and frustration for employees who are trying to do things correctly.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All