Don't expect to transform your career at LinkedIn - Anonymous employee LinkedIn Employee Review

1.0
Jun 29, 2011
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

LinkedIn has an awesome brand with the potential to be a great company and a market leader. There are slivers of very smart people. The products are cool.

Cons

For a small company, it's highly political. It contradicts itself on several levels: 1. By claiming to hire the best, but it hires incompetent leaders (especially middle management) and keeps legacy poor performers who are in the wrong roles (a.k.a., the Peter Principle). 2. There is further hypocracy by not abiding by its values. It has become too layered with management that is inaccessible and won't share information. 3. It claims to be a global company, yet it mandates that in order to have any career path, you must be at the HQ in Mountain View. Exceptions are made to certain telecommuters on a hush-hush basis--but not to others--therefore creating unfair practices. As an internet company in this century, I would expect more flexibility in order to retain and attract employees. 4. Benefits are marginal at best for an internet company trying to compete against the big boys. You may as well work at a bank. 5. Wants to be a big player and has the attitude of its neighbor, but it is not implementing practices to compete. 6. It's impossible to have a career path at LinkedIn when they have poor management, poor communication, and oversight of great talent.

Explore other reviews about LinkedIn

5.0
Jun 9, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Excellent work life balance and great kind of environment

Cons

There is a lot of pressure on deliverables

4.0
Jun 11, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

LinkedIn has a strong engineering culture, smart and supportive teammates, and meaningful product impact at a large scale. I have had opportunities to work on complex systems, collaborate with experienced engineers, and learn from cross-functional partners across product, design, data, and infrastructure. The benefits, flexibility, and internal learning resources are also strong.

Cons

Because the organization is large, decision-making can sometimes be slow, and priorities may shift before projects fully mature. Promotion expectations can feel different across teams, and the number of meetings can make it harder to protect deep-focus engineering time. Cross-team ownership is not always as clear as it could be.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All