DETROIT DIVISION - DO NOT TRUST MANAGEMENT - New Home Consultant (NHC) M/I Homes Employee Review

2.0
Jan 19, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Benefits are better than average.

Cons

-All about upper management hitting their numbers. You will be promised a lot in the beginning, how great the culture is, how seamless all departments work together, how much money you have “potential” to earn, how you will be the “CEO” of your own sales community. All B.S... Land development is weak, often pair up sales people in same community, they never listen to ideas of doing things more efficiently, they will find a way to let you go so you never collect on back log sales. If you are a woman, good luck, the president of division won’t even make eye contact with you if you have a conversation with him. Reactive management style vs Proactive. Promises, favoritism, conflicts of interest, protect certain employees. Bottom line, I felt like I was in an abusive, dysfunctional relationship working here. Run for the hills, do not work here!

Explore other reviews about M/I Homes

5.0
Feb 23, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I gained so much knowledge and skills.

Cons

Lots of traveling, wear and tear on the personal vehicle.

1.0
Mar 21, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Earning potential was great, benefits were decent.

Cons

An incredibly toxic work environment defined by micromanagement, constantly shifting and unrealistic sales goals, and a leadership team that often operated more like enforcers than mentors. Targets were routinely increased at the end of each quarter, effectively stripping salespeople of earned bonuses and eroding trust. The culture leaned heavily on intimidation and public pressure. Sales meetings often felt more like performance critiques than coaching, and required role-playing exercises were frequently uncomfortable and unnecessary. There was a consistent pattern of favoritism, where poor behavior was overlooked for some while others were held to entirely different standards. Management’s approach to motivation relied too heavily on guilt and financial pressure, with paid time off subtly discouraged and income used as leverage rather than support. Collaboration was undermined by leadership creating internal competition in ways that felt divisive rather than productive. There were also multiple instances of inappropriate and racially insensitive remarks made in group settings, which further contributed to an unprofessional and uncomfortable environment. Overall, while the role had potential, the culture and leadership practices made it difficult to succeed or feel respected.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All