Not great. The future looks worse. - Analyst Mathematica Employee Review

3.0
Nov 6, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

At one point we were known for rigor and objectivity. There are still some projects you could get involved with where you can find that.

Cons

The executive leadership is obsessed with AI being able to patch the holes in the ship. Roughly half the company was either laid off or left voluntarily over the past year. Layoffs are sloppy and often remove key people, some of them who've been with the company for decades. Lack of empathy. Reptilian CEO. CEO's underlings are weirdly sycophantic given that the company is performing so poorly. The board changed the companies governing rules to allow the CEO to stay on even after the shareholders (employees) voted no to his seat on the board. Disgusting. Cozying up to gross vendors like Palantir to try to win MAGA $$$. It's gross and getting worse. Sad because I used to love it here.

Explore other reviews about Mathematica

5.0
Apr 11, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great colleagues, 401k match, and interesting work

Cons

Work life balance could be improved and more ability to move between departments

3.0
Jun 29, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Smart people, impactful work. A real community.

Cons

Poor strategic planning. Rather than performing real analysis and proactive thinking, leadership reacts to the environment. Strategy development and implementation at Mathematica seems like leadership throws wet spaghetti against the wall to see what sticks. In the 2010s, it was predictive modeling. Rather than proactively using predictive modeling to support their client's goals and the organization's mission, they created a data analytics division, hired smart people, and provided no guidance to support the division. Today, AI has replaced predictive modeling. These examples provide two instances of failures of corporate leadership; many more exist. Unfortunately, the company suffers from short-term incentives and an aversion to long-term investments. As an employee-owned company, you would think that the board and leadership would be more responsive to the employees. No! Over time, they have removed employees' voices from decision-making and focused on increasing their own power and independence.

7
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All