OK place to work: Learned some but was too regimented, isolated and too much grunt work - Data Analytics Associate Mathematica Employee Review

3.0
Sep 27, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I learned how to be a better coder and got fluent in R. They teach very good, rigorous coding practices for "statistical programming" type work. Also learned about using Git which was helpful.

Cons

TOO REGIMENTED: You have to fill out 40 hours on a time sheet...even if you don't have enough work or have too much work. There's a lot of pressure to get to 40 some how. ISOLATED: You have your "supervisor" who staffs you on projects (but doesn't work with you otherwise). You might work 3-5 projects at a time. They all have their own deadlines etc. and you need to let them know what works and discuss with your supervisor on that. That said...if you DO push back...sometimes they just kinda say "no get it done on time" or whatever. HARD TO GET AHEAD: Very rigid/formal promotion structure. If you want to work on X type of work or learn Y skill, you can tell your supervisor...but no garuntee you end up on that project. It's also hard to know what type of work is out there. GRUNT WORK: Too much grunt work. I was given lots of "put field codes into this table" tasks...like for hundreds of cells across dozens of tables. ISOLATED WORK: Often times you're tossed on to a project to finish X task and then you leave. It's hard to make strong connections. Also, sometimes the task you're thrown on is useless grunt work. HOLIER THAN THOU ATTITUDE ABOUT BEING "WORKED OWNED": They love to talk about that but you can't actually vote on stuff like how many vacation days you should get. I wish we had a union.

Explore other reviews about Mathematica

5.0
Apr 11, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great colleagues, 401k match, and interesting work

Cons

Work life balance could be improved and more ability to move between departments

3.0
Jun 29, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Smart people, impactful work. A real community.

Cons

Poor strategic planning. Rather than performing real analysis and proactive thinking, leadership reacts to the environment. Strategy development and implementation at Mathematica seems like leadership throws wet spaghetti against the wall to see what sticks. In the 2010s, it was predictive modeling. Rather than proactively using predictive modeling to support their client's goals and the organization's mission, they created a data analytics division, hired smart people, and provided no guidance to support the division. Today, AI has replaced predictive modeling. These examples provide two instances of failures of corporate leadership; many more exist. Unfortunately, the company suffers from short-term incentives and an aversion to long-term investments. As an employee-owned company, you would think that the board and leadership would be more responsive to the employees. No! Over time, they have removed employees' voices from decision-making and focused on increasing their own power and independence.

8
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All