Worst Medtronic location to work at!! - Anonymous employee Medtronic Employee Review

1.0
Sep 14, 2018
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Worker bees are great and it Tries to maintain a good culture.

Cons

Management are the horrible! Dictatorship and they remind you there is no retaliation, but do not follow what they preach! HR is useless and only provide benefits to the company as a whole, no support to employees. This site was formerly Covidien and has not assimilated to the Medtronic ethical culture, as the management are racist and only seek employees that are submissive and of their ethnic. Most people work there and tolerate the misery to sustain employment and close commute to work. No one should have to work in such a horrid environment. This site also has not room for growth!

Explore other reviews about Medtronic

5.0
Jul 13, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Strong business impact You often help maintain or improve systems tied to quality, compliance, and product reliability. That can make the work meaningful and visible. Cross-functional exposure The role usually interacts with Quality, IT, Regulatory, Manufacturing, and sometimes R&D. That can build a broad network and good business understanding. Specialized, marketable skill set Experience with quality systems, validation, documentation, audits, and regulated applications can be valuable, especially in medtech, pharma, and other regulated industries. Good mix of technical and process work If you like solving system issues but also improving workflows and controls, this role can be a strong fit. Career mobility It can lead into areas such as: Quality systems management Validation or CSV Regulatory systems Business systems analysis Program or product ownership Compliance leadership

Cons

Heavy documentation burden A lot of the work may involve change control, validation records, SOP alignment, traceability, and audit readiness. That can feel slow or administrative. High compliance pressure Mistakes in quality applications can have significant downstream effects. The role often carries risk sensitivity and scrutiny. Slower pace of change In regulated environments, even simple updates may require formal review, testing, approval, and training. That can be frustrating if you prefer fast execution. Competing priorities You may have to balance user requests, system issues, compliance needs, and audit deadlines at the same time. Limited creativity in some environments Depending on the team, the role may be more about control, stability, and process discipline than innovation.

3.0
Jun 24, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Generous, old-school benefits. Almost twice the PTO as other places I've worked, excellent healthcare, 401K matching, etc. Many high-quality colleagues and a generally mellow, polite business culture.

Cons

Multiple competing bureaucracies, internal consultancies, a computer-illiterate 'stakeholder' class with permission to disrupt anything, and perverse incentives driving waste.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All