Company has really gone downhill. - HMA Merakey Employee Review

3.0
Dec 3, 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Working with individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities is both challenging and rewarding. The clients who are able and willing are given many opportunities for activities in the community. If you want to work a lot of overtime, it's available.

Cons

AVS was a private company before being acquired by NHS in 2008. Since then, it has become a "business" rather than a community. Morale is low. Good house managers come and go fast. Depending on your HM, it is sometimes hard to take time off. Lazy workers seem to get away with anything. They use a lot of agency personnel. They are constantly taking benefits away. The 403B used to match 4.5%, plus a dividend for years with the company. When the economy tanked, they dropped it to a flat 2%, saying they would give it back when things improved. They never have, and most likely never will. If you are over 50, or have 10 or more years with the company, they will do anything to terminate you. If ever a company needed a union, it's this one. They can accuse you of anything, and you have no way to defend yourself against lies.

Explore other reviews about Merakey

5.0
Apr 30, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great Company and I love individuals we serve

Cons

More exposure in job fairs and hiring events. getting our company name out there with more social media advertising

1.0
Dec 16, 2025
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The mission of the organization is meaningful, and hiring managers genuinely value quality candidates and strong placements. The work can be rewarding when the focus is on making thoughtful hires that truly support vulnerable individuals. Team members care deeply about doing the right thing and producing strong, long-term results.

Cons

Under new management, recruiting has shifted to a numbers-driven model where metrics far outweigh quality, outcomes, and human impact. Recruiters are now responsible for interviewing and decision-making while simultaneously being held to significantly higher, rigid goals that do not account for location based candidate flow or program differences. Time is spent submitting phone screens and documenting nonviable candidates purely to satisfy metrics instead of actively sourcing strong applicants. Being discouraged from cherry-picking candidates, despite hiring for roles supporting vulnerable populations is concerning and demoralizing. This approach reduces efficiency, negatively impacts candidate experience, and has contributed to burnout and low morale. The system feels misaligned with the mission and set up for failure.

4
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All