It has been a great learning experience, but there is no room for growth, little training, and poor supervision. - Case Manager Merakey Employee Review

2.0
Apr 5, 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Flexibility - You can flex your time, work 5 hours one day and 10 another, or come in from 10-6 or 7-3, whatever floats your boat. Management seems to take employee concerns somewhat seriously...sometimes. Probably more than at other places, but I think we get a little spoiled and complain about this issue a lot. Coworkers can be great Management gives you chances to mess up. Incentive - If you bill high enough, you'll earn a ( very highly taxed) bonus in your check

Cons

Low pay Little support at times, sometimes there's a "figure it out" mentality Lack of consistency - one supervisor will tell you one thing, and another will tell you something totally different 5 minutes later...literally Billing first, people later - sometimes it feels like all they care about is how much you bill, not what you're doing for your consumers

Explore other reviews about Merakey

5.0
Apr 30, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great Company and I love individuals we serve

Cons

More exposure in job fairs and hiring events. getting our company name out there with more social media advertising

1.0
Dec 16, 2025
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The mission of the organization is meaningful, and hiring managers genuinely value quality candidates and strong placements. The work can be rewarding when the focus is on making thoughtful hires that truly support vulnerable individuals. Team members care deeply about doing the right thing and producing strong, long-term results.

Cons

Under new management, recruiting has shifted to a numbers-driven model where metrics far outweigh quality, outcomes, and human impact. Recruiters are now responsible for interviewing and decision-making while simultaneously being held to significantly higher, rigid goals that do not account for location based candidate flow or program differences. Time is spent submitting phone screens and documenting nonviable candidates purely to satisfy metrics instead of actively sourcing strong applicants. Being discouraged from cherry-picking candidates, despite hiring for roles supporting vulnerable populations is concerning and demoralizing. This approach reduces efficiency, negatively impacts candidate experience, and has contributed to burnout and low morale. The system feels misaligned with the mission and set up for failure.

4
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All