Improving as an organization but senior management can lack insight - Program Director Merakey Employee Review

4.0
Jun 28, 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

-The culture has been improving over the last couple of years since rebranding from NHS name. -A solid focus on diversity and cultural competency from leadership -They have a good CEO and President in Joe Martz and Ted Dallas. Both are fairly accessible from a Director level -Good benefits depending on your status (ie. Full time, union or non-union, FFS therapist or hourly/salaried employee, etc..). -Generous PTO and 1.5%-2.0% COLAs each year.

Cons

-very little leadership development. I had to get a Masters degree to help with that area. They need a leadership development program. At this point they are only focusing on that from a diversity standpoint, which is important, but leaders come from every ethnicity not just underrepresented groups - The pay is fair in some positions and not fair for others

Explore other reviews about Merakey

5.0
Apr 30, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great Company and I love individuals we serve

Cons

More exposure in job fairs and hiring events. getting our company name out there with more social media advertising

1.0
Dec 16, 2025
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The mission of the organization is meaningful, and hiring managers genuinely value quality candidates and strong placements. The work can be rewarding when the focus is on making thoughtful hires that truly support vulnerable individuals. Team members care deeply about doing the right thing and producing strong, long-term results.

Cons

Under new management, recruiting has shifted to a numbers-driven model where metrics far outweigh quality, outcomes, and human impact. Recruiters are now responsible for interviewing and decision-making while simultaneously being held to significantly higher, rigid goals that do not account for location based candidate flow or program differences. Time is spent submitting phone screens and documenting nonviable candidates purely to satisfy metrics instead of actively sourcing strong applicants. Being discouraged from cherry-picking candidates, despite hiring for roles supporting vulnerable populations is concerning and demoralizing. This approach reduces efficiency, negatively impacts candidate experience, and has contributed to burnout and low morale. The system feels misaligned with the mission and set up for failure.

4
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All