employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Mercury Insurance Company

Engaged Employer

I would NOT recommend to anyone! - Appraisal Specialist Mercury Insurance Company Employee Review

1.0
Apr 27, 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The only pro I can even think about is that they allow their employees to dress casual throughout the work week.

Cons

High Expectations Low compensation, Heavy workload. They hire in large groups due to the high turnover rate. They hire entry level students/recent graduates with no experience and pay them low and expect them to work a desk that is backlogged, super busy, and is NO where entry level work. Depending on which job, before you are able to work they make you take a 3 day insurance classroom course so you are licensed (in which I was not even aware about as they did not mention any additional courses or test on the job description and interview) They do provide extensive training for the role you were hired. During the 8 weeks of training a lot of people in my group I was hired on board with slowly quit one by one. Now it makes sense as to why they need to provide that much training because they hire people with absolutely NO experience which is fine, I understand everyone deserves a chance to start somewhere but don't put entry level employees in a desk where they can't handle it just so you can pay them cheap! That's why I believe there is a heavy turn over rate! If you want to get your foot in the insurance world then Mercury would be for you to gain experience but if you have insurance experience like I do, do NOT come here. They host job fairs for the same jobs every month because the turn over is out of control.

Explore other reviews about Mercury Insurance Company

5.0
May 15, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Fast Process Remote Great team

Cons

I can not think of any

2.0
Jun 8, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I worked with several talented people and had positive interactions with multiple business stakeholders. The company has strong brand recognition, meaningful business lines, and some leaders who genuinely value recruiting partnership.

Cons

My experience in Talent Acquisition became increasingly difficult because the management style I experienced felt highly controlling, punitive, and focused more on scrutiny than coaching, workload calibration, or clear success metrics. In my opinion, the environment became one where a manager’s narrative could outweigh production, stakeholder feedback, and the actual complexity of the workload. I raised concerns through internal channels and later experienced increased scrutiny, formal performance action, and ultimately termination with what I viewed as a vague and incomplete explanation. From my perspective, the process lacked fairness, transparency, and meaningful opportunity to address concerns through objective measures. I would caution candidates and employees to pay close attention to the specific leadership chain they would report into, not just the broader company reputation. Advice to Management: Ensure performance concerns are handled with clear metrics, documented coaching, balanced stakeholder input, and genuine review of workload realities. A company’s employment brand is affected not only by candidate experience, but also by how internal employees are treated when they raise concerns.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All