Positive aspects overshadowed by management issues and confusion - Anonymous employee NetApp Employee Review

2.0
Jun 9, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Free food, drinks, nice people. Was able to work from home a couple days and times were flexible. Interesting work.

Cons

- Upper management does not know what they want to do and messaging is contradictory to what they actually do. - They keep rolling back the days that we have to come into the office - it was 2 days when I started, then it became 3, now there's whispers of 4. And it's a hard requirement of x amount of days per quarter, so if you get sick or take a vacation, you have to make those days up. - The business processes are lacking structure - documentation is all over the place, trying to figure out who to talk to when you have a problem is an adventure in frustration, and they are pushing AI hard but do not mandate any specific tool, so it's all over the place. - There seems to be a bias towards the folks in India - no will admit it, but it is readily obvious to new employees. And there is an undercurrent of "Us" vs "Them" - The review/rating structure is so bad and something I have never encountered before - if you are rated at a certain level by your manager, that may not be what you ultimately get because your rating is not just based on your personal performance, but also the ratings of others.

Explore other reviews about NetApp

5.0
Jun 7, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

NetApp is a prestigious company, working for this company will be a great resume boost if you cannot break into top fortune 500 companies. Relatively easy to get into NetApp. Competitive pay.

Cons

Frequent layoffs. Understaffed which could equate to higher expected output.

1.0
Jul 22, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

+ Some genuinely talented, kind engineers on the ground who make the day-to-day bearable. + Established company with recognizable products, so it's a fine résumé line if that's what you need.

Cons

- Compensation isn't remotely competitive with other tech companies for the same work, expect to be underpaid relative to peers doing equivalent engineering elsewhere. - Return-to-office mandate with attendance tracking. Leadership doesn't just require office days, they freaking track and count how many days each person badges in. This is giving jail-vibes and they treat you like a kid instead of grown-up professional. - Forced-ranking reviews. A mandatory quota means roughly 10% of people must be rated "not meeting expectations" regardless of actual performance. Good engineers get labeled underperformers just to fill the curve. - Manufactured internal competition. Because ratings are a zero-sum quota, teammates are effectively pitted against each other. It kills collaboration and makes the environment toxic. - Routine layoffs. In my experience, layoffs came around like clockwork — roughly twice a year, which meant constant job insecurity and a demoralized team that never got to feel stable. - Leadership has run a once-great company into the ground. In my opinion, George and the current C-level team have turned what used to be a respected place to work into a miserable, pathetic place. The direction under this leadership has been consistently toward more monitoring and pressure, and less trust, autonomy, and morale.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All