NGST is an all right place to work. - CSC Systems Engineer Northrop Grumman Employee Review

3.0
Aug 15, 2008
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Flexible hours for systems engineers. The 9/80 work schedule is a great perk. As long as your work is done, you can work any hours that you would like. You can start work as late as 11am if that is your desire. You can start work as early as 5am if that is your desire. Telecommuting options are also avilable. This place offers a good hourly wages for new college graduates. Deadlines are usually very soft. If you cannot finish a task in 10 hours, you can simply tell management that it won't get done and they'll just accept it.

Cons

The work of a systems engineer can be tedious. If you're working in the latter stages of a program, all the design has pretty much been accomplished. Your job is then to just track and trend data. It's not very exciting. Managers, in general, only have acceptable people skills. Engineers tend to lack the ability to inspire and bring out the best qualities on their team. Moral for most programs is just ok and not a lot of people love their jobs here. The science of payload satellites is quite interesting, but the entry level engineer work can be annoying.

Explore other reviews about Northrop Grumman

5.0
Jun 25, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Awesome campus and great benefits

Cons

nothing I can think of

1.0
Jun 11, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Not much pros but talented coworkers.

Cons

I joined expecting a long-term career and initially had a positive experience. Unfortunately, the culture changed significantly after leadership transitions. Micromanagement increased, decision-making became highly centralized, and employee morale steadily declined. Many experienced employees and managers left during my time there, making it difficult to maintain continuity and trust within the organization. The work itself was meaningful, and I had the opportunity to support important projects with talented colleagues. However, recognition, career growth, and employee retention did not appear to receive the same level of attention as process, reporting, and management oversight. My layoff was communicated as unrelated to performance, which was appreciated. However, after years of contribution and institutional knowledge, the overall experience left me feeling that employees were viewed as replaceable rather than valued long-term assets.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All