One of the best start-ups to work for in the US - Backend Engineer Oura Employee Review

5.0
Apr 17, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- ŌURA is a remote-first company with no plans to require a return to office, at least for software engineering roles. - The company holds a leading position in the smart ring market and continues to show strong growth—making equity a valuable part of your compensation over time. - Generous benefits go beyond the norm, including a $300/month wellness stipend, $70/month internet/phone stipend, $750 annual professional development budget, and a one-time $500 work-from-home setup allowance. The flexibility in how these can be used is a big plus. - PTO is well above average: 4 weeks of vacation, 8 Wellness Days, and 13 paid holidays annually. This aligns more with the amount of PTO that European companies get, and you don't have the BS that comes with "unlimited" PTO. - Despite operating at startup speed, management takes work-life balance seriously and makes real efforts to adjust workloads based on employee well-being. - You'll work with modern, cutting-edge technologies—rarely, if ever, dealing with outdated stacks. - Management is outcome-focused and gives teams autonomy to determine how best to achieve their goals, providing a high level of trust and independence.

Cons

- The pace of progress can occasionally be too fast, leaving limited time to address naturally accumulated technical debt. Periodic cool-down sprints would help the team recalibrate and maintain long-term code quality.

Explore other reviews about Oura

5.0
May 21, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

great culture and mission. product is going places

Cons

working at an ambitious company means feeling spread thin at times

2.0
May 5, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great benefits, growing company with lots of opportunities.

Cons

Management struggles to align on priorities, which creates a constantly shifting environment with unclear direction and success metrics. Teams are often given contradictory guidance or asked to pivot without context, making it difficult to execute effectively or plan with confidence. There is also a concerning pattern in how feedback is handled. Feedback often appears to be based on assumptions rather than concrete examples or evidence. When employees raise reasonable concerns or ask for clarity, it is sometimes reframed as negativity or labeled as contributing to a “toxic environment.” This shifts focus away from the underlying issues such as lack of alignment and communication and places it on individuals instead. Over time, this dynamic discourages open dialogue and reduces trust. Teams become more focused on managing perception than delivering outcomes, which ultimately impacts morale, efficiency, and overall performance.

5
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All