Excellent working environment - Senior Recruitment Adviser Pearson Employee Review

4.0
Feb 1, 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Pearson was a great environment to work in and a company I would highly recommend to work for. The main London office 80 Strand being a a great location in the iconic building that also overlooks the Thames on Embankment. The company is now developing a truly modern Digital feel with its desire to become like a Google or Yahoo type company with its friendly but work hard ethic. There were refreshingly very few egos and the culture of Pearson was to treat your colleagues with respect and as equals whatever their role. The Senior Management were great and really engaging, it was easy to build great relationship with the VP's and Senior Stakeholders. Pearson is improving at recruiting from within and offers excellent career progression. Socially it is also really good with high quality staff restaurants and cafes there providing great opportunities to meet other employees and make new friends. Overall I loved my time at Pearson and would return in a heartbeat if an opportunity presented itself.

Cons

The company is changing so fast from being an old fashioned publishing company to being a Digital platforms company that it is going through some degree of pain. There is some outsourcing going on to reduce costs and it is not clear what areas that may impact moving forward.

Explore other reviews about Pearson

5.0
Jun 29, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Lunch time is the only pro

Cons

Management sucks, I hate having to request for time off because I never get it

1
2.0
Jun 11, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

When a project goes according to plan you can work with some great people and make decent money.

Cons

Bad behavior is tolerated when you have a weak team member. They are allowed to remain on payroll, even if they do not effectively contribute. The burden is often placed on the team members willing to pick up the slack. Promotions are not given to the most qualified. They are randomly assigned. There are some horrible scoring directors as a result.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All