Worst management ever - SLS QualityAI Employee Review

2.0
Nov 25, 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

In some teams, work-life balance is ok.

Cons

Worst management ever. TLs have no idea what they are doing. Tasks lack instructions. Most of the projects are chaotic. They insist on a transparency policy at the same time they make employees sign papers saying their salaries are confidential. They create performance improvement plans to screw people: they don't give reasons for it to happen, they don't show the documents supporting it, they don't give feedback. Company works in a very vertical way. Feedback from employees is ignored. HR is truly aggressive and lies all the time. If a TL decides you lack something, there's no way to get an honest discussion about it. They create an environment of suspicion and everybody is afraid. The teams are very unbalanced, with some with nothing to do at all (again, bad management that forces people to stay 9 hours a day at the office with literally nothing to do) and others with burn-outs. No one really cares about work, it is basically show-off. Lots of useless meetings, and an unbelievable lack of structure. TL made it possible, during covid, to have 3 hours per day of online social meetings! It was a boys club to discuss videogames and waste eveybody's time. In 1:1, many people complained about this, but it was ignored because TL wanted to play. It's mostly a culture of bootlicking.

Explore other reviews about QualityAI

5.0
Jun 22, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great management and multiple projects

Cons

less learning and repetitive work

3.0
Jul 13, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Exposure to High-Level Technology: The role offers the chance to work with a modern and diverse tech stack, including Playwright, Java, Python, and Cucumber, as well as architecting CI/CD-integrated automation frameworks. Innovation and AI Integration: You will have the opportunity to leverage Generative AI for advanced test design, data simulation (such as creating complex patient vitals), and automated code reviews, staying at the forefront of industry trends. Leadership and Global Collaboration: The position involves directing hybrid onshore/offshore teams, allowing for experience in standardizing engineering governance and mentoring junior staff on a global scale. High Technical Impact: Technical contributions lead to significant, measurable outcomes, such as reducing testing cycles by up to 90% and accelerating project delivery timelines by 35% through modular architecture and automation. Diverse Industry Experience: Working here provides broad experience across multiple regulated sectors, including defense, healthcare, and fintech, which builds a highly versatile professional profile.

Cons

Management Priorities vs. Branding: While the company emphasizes "Quality" in its branding and name, there is a perceived disconnect in practice. Management often appears more focused on financial metrics and profit margins than on delivering a high-quality product for the customer. Contractual Focus on Quality: Despite the company's identity, the word "quality" is rarely emphasized within the actual contracts, suggesting that the mission-driven focus on excellence is secondary to the business arrangement. Project-Based Job Security: Employment stability is strictly tied to specific client assignments. When a project concludes—whether due to client restructuring or government funding changes—there is a high risk of being let go. Limited Internal Mobility: There is a notable lack of immediate transfer opportunities or internal reassignment support when a contract ends, often requiring employees to seek external roles rather than transitioning to a new project within the firm.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All