Bad company for Experienced ppl, Good for Juniors only. - QA Engineer QualityAI Employee Review

2.0
Sep 3, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good for course/uni graduates without experience at all to gain some experience in the industry.

Cons

- Low salaries, no raises and even when they do give you a raise it's very low and they(the management) act like they're doing you a favor. - No growth opportunities, they promise to give you courses like automation so you could later advance to automation engineer roles, but eventually they tell to looks for courses online and study on your own. Previously they gave their employees free access to Udemy premium courses (which was the only good benefit they had at the time) but after some time they decided to switch to a "customized" learning platform (which lacked of actually good courses, because most of them are either very short or outdated) to save money on the premium access to Udemy. - Management: there is no clear hierarchy in the company, you can work on one project where your direct manager is responsible for another 100 people at the same time, good luck with trying to receive any attention in this way (sometimes you needed to reminder them of your existence in the company...).

Explore other reviews about QualityAI

5.0
Jun 22, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great management and multiple projects

Cons

less learning and repetitive work

3.0
Jul 13, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Exposure to High-Level Technology: The role offers the chance to work with a modern and diverse tech stack, including Playwright, Java, Python, and Cucumber, as well as architecting CI/CD-integrated automation frameworks. Innovation and AI Integration: You will have the opportunity to leverage Generative AI for advanced test design, data simulation (such as creating complex patient vitals), and automated code reviews, staying at the forefront of industry trends. Leadership and Global Collaboration: The position involves directing hybrid onshore/offshore teams, allowing for experience in standardizing engineering governance and mentoring junior staff on a global scale. High Technical Impact: Technical contributions lead to significant, measurable outcomes, such as reducing testing cycles by up to 90% and accelerating project delivery timelines by 35% through modular architecture and automation. Diverse Industry Experience: Working here provides broad experience across multiple regulated sectors, including defense, healthcare, and fintech, which builds a highly versatile professional profile.

Cons

Management Priorities vs. Branding: While the company emphasizes "Quality" in its branding and name, there is a perceived disconnect in practice. Management often appears more focused on financial metrics and profit margins than on delivering a high-quality product for the customer. Contractual Focus on Quality: Despite the company's identity, the word "quality" is rarely emphasized within the actual contracts, suggesting that the mission-driven focus on excellence is secondary to the business arrangement. Project-Based Job Security: Employment stability is strictly tied to specific client assignments. When a project concludes—whether due to client restructuring or government funding changes—there is a high risk of being let go. Limited Internal Mobility: There is a notable lack of immediate transfer opportunities or internal reassignment support when a contract ends, often requiring employees to seek external roles rather than transitioning to a new project within the firm.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All