Support your people through actual actions - Anonymous employee Radiology Partners Employee Review

2.0
Nov 25, 2025
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Direct manager is awesome and leads by example.

Cons

Poor work life balance. Team members within the HR team are overworked and need the HR leadership to support and advocate for its own team members. Your people are supporting others and carrying other people's burdens and mess, they need to feel supported by not just words but actions. Example, if someone disagrees or questions an action or initiative, listen to understand, rather than get defensive. Or, knowing that with the migration of a new system, support and advocate for your people by being realistic and manage expectations with leadership , so that team members don't get burnt out by working the already busy day to day tasks while having to be on calls after hours.

avatar
Radiology Partners Response
6mo
Thank you for your valuable feedback. RP was founded in 2012 with a mission to transform radiology. We achieve this goal by building a collaborative culture that encourages feedback at every level of the practice. We're truly grateful to have you on the team as we work together to transform radiology. If you have additional feedback, please don’t hesitate to reach out to your HR representative.

Explore other reviews about Radiology Partners

5.0
May 19, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Flexibility and work life balance

Cons

Nothing I could think of.

avatar
Radiology Partners Response
1mo
Thank you, for taking the time to share a thoughtful review. We, too, believe that RP is a great place to work. We are grateful you are part of the team as we work together to transform radiology!
2.0
Jul 20, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Strong immediate team, talented technical peers, and meaningful enterprise technology challenges. I worked here for 16 years, and the best part of the job was consistently the people closest to the work. My direct team and direct leadership were supportive, capable, and genuinely cared.

Cons

The last six years were very different from the first ten. Senior leadership alignment has been a persistent issue, with unclear ownership, overlapping initiatives, conflicting architecture direction, and organizational tension that often flows down to delivery teams. Growth opportunities did not feel transparent. I was in grade for approximately four years despite increasing responsibility, and at least one promotion opportunity felt predetermined rather than genuinely open to internal candidates. Compensation also became a factor. Raises did not keep pace with inflation or responsibility, full target bonuses were not achieved, benefits costs increased, and retirement contribution value declined. The biggest issue was the gap between architecture titles and actual authority. Platform and Azure architects were often not asked to define problems, evaluate options, or design solutions. Instead, decisions were frequently shaped elsewhere by vendors, consultants, or senior leadership, and internal teams were asked to implement or adapt them. That is closer to senior engineering than architecture. When internal teams raised concerns about governance, security, supportability, or long-term architecture standards, those concerns could be treated as roadblocks rather than responsible technical stewardship.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All