My personal review on RP - Anonymous employee Radiology Partners Employee Review

3.0
Sep 18, 2017
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

There is a lot of opportunity to see how all of the different practices do day to day tasks. Good benefits. It will be interesting to see how this company evolves in the future.

Cons

Very obvious favoritism and disorganization in management. Office politics. A lot of negativity. Lack of communication between teams. They usually hire from the outside before they promote people. Understaffed/overworked.

avatar
Radiology Partners Response
8y
Thank you for the review and for being a part of our growth in the last 3 years! It has definitely been an adventure. As you know, our growth is exciting, fast paced and often requires a lot of hard work. At times teams may feel understaffed and we always do our best to address that but the only way we truly can is if you communicate openly with your manager. Management is encouraged to promote from within when the opportunity arises and feel they have a teammate ready for the promotion. Being part of a growing organization also means there is a lot of opportunity for movement within so I would encourage you to look at all of the open positions we have on our website to see if any interest you. We are always open to feedback and would love to partner with you in the areas you have identified for improvement. I highly encourage you to speak to your Manager or anyone in HR so that your concerns can be heard and addressed. RP appreciates your feedback!

Explore other reviews about Radiology Partners

5.0
May 19, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Flexibility and work life balance

Cons

Nothing I could think of.

avatar
Radiology Partners Response
1mo
Thank you, for taking the time to share a thoughtful review. We, too, believe that RP is a great place to work. We are grateful you are part of the team as we work together to transform radiology!
2.0
Jul 20, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Strong immediate team, talented technical peers, and meaningful enterprise technology challenges. I worked here for 16 years, and the best part of the job was consistently the people closest to the work. My direct team and direct leadership were supportive, capable, and genuinely cared.

Cons

The last six years were very different from the first ten. Senior leadership alignment has been a persistent issue, with unclear ownership, overlapping initiatives, conflicting architecture direction, and organizational tension that often flows down to delivery teams. Growth opportunities did not feel transparent. I was in grade for approximately four years despite increasing responsibility, and at least one promotion opportunity felt predetermined rather than genuinely open to internal candidates. Compensation also became a factor. Raises did not keep pace with inflation or responsibility, full target bonuses were not achieved, benefits costs increased, and retirement contribution value declined. The biggest issue was the gap between architecture titles and actual authority. Platform and Azure architects were often not asked to define problems, evaluate options, or design solutions. Instead, decisions were frequently shaped elsewhere by vendors, consultants, or senior leadership, and internal teams were asked to implement or adapt them. That is closer to senior engineering than architecture. When internal teams raised concerns about governance, security, supportability, or long-term architecture standards, those concerns could be treated as roadblocks rather than responsible technical stewardship.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All