Love my job, but this "move" is absolutely ridiculous - Anonymous employee Radiology Partners Employee Review

4.0
Jan 15, 2019
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Flexibility, support, rewarding industry to be a part of, always growing and feel like I have great job stability

Cons

Our headquarters ran out of space a year ago. They started moving teams offsite to temporary spaces in April. When the whole process started, we were informed we would be in our new home by January 2019. It is January 2019 and we have no idea when we actually will be all together again. It got pushed back to Feb/March then May, now who knows! It is extremely hard to work cross functionally with the teams that are now off site. There is no "teamwork" because no one is accommodating the teams offsite or willing to go to them. It feels like an "every man (or department) for them self" right now. At this rate, I hope to still be working at Radiology Partners when our new home is complete.

Explore other reviews about Radiology Partners

5.0
May 19, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Flexibility and work life balance

Cons

Nothing I could think of.

avatar
Radiology Partners Response
1mo
Thank you, for taking the time to share a thoughtful review. We, too, believe that RP is a great place to work. We are grateful you are part of the team as we work together to transform radiology!
2.0
Jul 20, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Strong immediate team, talented technical peers, and meaningful enterprise technology challenges. I worked here for 16 years, and the best part of the job was consistently the people closest to the work. My direct team and direct leadership were supportive, capable, and genuinely cared.

Cons

The last six years were very different from the first ten. Senior leadership alignment has been a persistent issue, with unclear ownership, overlapping initiatives, conflicting architecture direction, and organizational tension that often flows down to delivery teams. Growth opportunities did not feel transparent. I was in grade for approximately four years despite increasing responsibility, and at least one promotion opportunity felt predetermined rather than genuinely open to internal candidates. Compensation also became a factor. Raises did not keep pace with inflation or responsibility, full target bonuses were not achieved, benefits costs increased, and retirement contribution value declined. The biggest issue was the gap between architecture titles and actual authority. Platform and Azure architects were often not asked to define problems, evaluate options, or design solutions. Instead, decisions were frequently shaped elsewhere by vendors, consultants, or senior leadership, and internal teams were asked to implement or adapt them. That is closer to senior engineering than architecture. When internal teams raised concerns about governance, security, supportability, or long-term architecture standards, those concerns could be treated as roadblocks rather than responsible technical stewardship.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All