Please do not work here - IT - Anonymous employee Radiology Partners Employee Review

2.0
Jan 30, 2025
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The pay for mid to upper-level positions is pretty good. Very generous with expenses; most leaders will accept any excuse to take people to expensive dinners

Cons

- Workload is overwhelming; a 60-hour week is a light load here. Work-life balance is just a buzzword. - Way too many meetings/Teams calls. I average 5-6 hours of meetings PER DAY. I've seen the calendars of other staff who have meetings across all four time zones, with 10-12 hours of back-to-back meetings daily. Still expected to get work done. - Many upper-level leaders seem to work 24/7 and expect everyone else to do the same. I'm not sure how some of them got married/had kids/stay married/etc. See above. - Constant restructuring, some of which has to happen because they burn out a high-level manager/director and find they have been doing the work of 4-5 people, making it impossible to replace them with just one person - There are so many service lanes, all of which operate in a vacuum. It ends up like going to college and all five of your professors assign you two hours of homework each night...it's not feasible but there is no communication between them and they wouldn't care anyway - Far too many leadership roles. Managers, directors, associate VPs, senior VPs, just plain VPs, C-suite. Not only does this muddy the waters on priorities, but you end up accountable to so many different people that it becomes impossible to satisfy them all at the same time. In fact, you often have to choose who to disappoint/make angry due to time and resource constraints - Many leaders are leaders in name only and have no clue how to actually lead and inspire people. So many in upper-level management are condescending and just plain mean. There are a lot of emotional, reactive decisions made that end up just wasting time and resources - The point above happens probably because this company is 'physician owned'. If you have worked in healthcare for any significant time, you likely understand that doctors can be good at their primary job and absolutely awful at everything else. That holds true here. I've seen some of the dumbest demands from doctors here, and they must be catered to. Many of the non-physician leaders fear the doctors so much that they never put up any resistance to even the worst decisions. - The worst timelines/deadlines for projects and other work I have ever dealt with in two decades of professional IT work. - Constant fires; I wake up every day full of dread for what will go wrong

Explore other reviews about Radiology Partners

5.0
May 19, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Flexibility and work life balance

Cons

Nothing I could think of.

avatar
Radiology Partners Response
1mo
Thank you, for taking the time to share a thoughtful review. We, too, believe that RP is a great place to work. We are grateful you are part of the team as we work together to transform radiology!
2.0
Jul 20, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Strong immediate team, talented technical peers, and meaningful enterprise technology challenges. I worked here for 16 years, and the best part of the job was consistently the people closest to the work. My direct team and direct leadership were supportive, capable, and genuinely cared.

Cons

The last six years were very different from the first ten. Senior leadership alignment has been a persistent issue, with unclear ownership, overlapping initiatives, conflicting architecture direction, and organizational tension that often flows down to delivery teams. Growth opportunities did not feel transparent. I was in grade for approximately four years despite increasing responsibility, and at least one promotion opportunity felt predetermined rather than genuinely open to internal candidates. Compensation also became a factor. Raises did not keep pace with inflation or responsibility, full target bonuses were not achieved, benefits costs increased, and retirement contribution value declined. The biggest issue was the gap between architecture titles and actual authority. Platform and Azure architects were often not asked to define problems, evaluate options, or design solutions. Instead, decisions were frequently shaped elsewhere by vendors, consultants, or senior leadership, and internal teams were asked to implement or adapt them. That is closer to senior engineering than architecture. When internal teams raised concerns about governance, security, supportability, or long-term architecture standards, those concerns could be treated as roadblocks rather than responsible technical stewardship.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All