Be cautios of temp agencys in general beacuse essentialy their job brokers and in the big picture union busters. - Patient Access Representative Randstad US Employee Review

2.0
Jan 25, 2009
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Was placed in a temp position the next day.

Cons

Biggest downside is benefits and salary. Compared to the job's actual salary thats listed on the clients website its more then 10000 less and as for the health benefits I would get better care under state medicaid copared to what they offer. But the most important thing for anyone reading this is that they will say anything to get you take the job. They stated at the intial interview my hourly wage would be 13.00 something and that there would be room for growth and I would be there long enough to goto perm. But the next day I found out I was being paid 10.85/hr and the job would only last for 5 weeks.

Explore other reviews about Randstad US

5.0
Jun 24, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great salary and benefits Supportive team

Cons

Clients can be difficult to work for

1.0
Jul 8, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Competitive compensation and benefits. Opportunities to build strong client relationships and develop HR and leadership skills. I was fortunate to work for a direct manager who genuinely supported and believed in me, which made my experience positive for several years. High performers can receive meaningful recognition, such as Presidents Club, and the role provides valuable experience in employee relations, recruiting, operations, and client management that can strengthen your résumé. A good company to get some experience but not a good long term company to work for.

Cons

Lack of transparency and accountability. My biggest issue was not being terminated—it was how the company handled it. Although I understand Connecticut is an at-will employment state, I believe employees deserve an honest explanation when their employment ends. Despite repeatedly asking, I was never told why I was being terminated. I went nearly three months without an answer and only learned the company’s stated reason after reviewing unemployment paperwork they submitted while contesting my claim. Prior to my termination, I had never received formal discipline or written warnings. Just two months earlier, I had earned Presidents Club, one of the company’s highest performance recognitions. Going from being recognized as a top performer to being terminated without a meaningful explanation was shocking and left me questioning the company’s commitment to transparency and fairness. In my experience, Human Resources did not provide answers or advocate for transparency. Instead, I felt they supported leadership’s decision without giving me the information I was requesting. During my years with the company, I also observed situations involving other employees that, in hindsight, made me question how employment decisions were handled. After my own experience, I came away feeling that performance alone did not determine job security. I also perceived that long-tenured employees were treated differently than newer employees, regardless of performance. One of the most unsettling parts of my experience was feeling that if leadership became unhappy with an employee, that employee could be terminated with little explanation. Whether or not that was actually the reason in every case, it created an environment where I felt job security depended more on staying in favor than on performance. That uncertainty made the workplace feel unpredictable and, ultimately, unsettling. If transparency, communication, and feeling valued as an employee are important to you, my experience suggests you should ask careful questions before accepting a position. My experience at the end of my employment was completely different from the company I believed I had been working for during my first several years.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All