This was a contract position at Wells Fargo - User Experience Designer Randstad US Employee Review

3.0
May 13, 2010
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Friendly and responsive recruiters. Very large agency, which has potential advantages in terms of placement opportunities. Good pay rates. Does not come across as a fly-by-night "body shop", like so many other high tech placement firms.

Cons

Benefit package was so-so. The health plans were quite expensive (I was hoping for more reasonable plans considering their size). Local office (formerly Sapphire Technologies) seemed reluctant to help me find international placements. I'd expressed interest in taking on long-term gigs in exotic locales (like Paris, London, Hong Kong), but the recruiters didn't help. They just told me to use the company's website to search for positions. My biggest complaint was that after my gig was finished at Wells Fargo, Vedior was not able to find any additional work for me, even though I'd received glowing reviews from my managers and colleagues at Wells Fargo. Granted, this happened during a bad recession. Nevertheless, the tech sector has really picked up lately...

Explore other reviews about Randstad US

5.0
Jun 24, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great salary and benefits Supportive team

Cons

Clients can be difficult to work for

1.0
Jul 8, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Competitive compensation and benefits. Opportunities to build strong client relationships and develop HR and leadership skills. I was fortunate to work for a direct manager who genuinely supported and believed in me, which made my experience positive for several years. High performers can receive meaningful recognition, such as Presidents Club, and the role provides valuable experience in employee relations, recruiting, operations, and client management that can strengthen your résumé. A good company to get some experience but not a good long term company to work for.

Cons

Lack of transparency and accountability. My biggest issue was not being terminated—it was how the company handled it. Although I understand Connecticut is an at-will employment state, I believe employees deserve an honest explanation when their employment ends. Despite repeatedly asking, I was never told why I was being terminated. I went nearly three months without an answer and only learned the company’s stated reason after reviewing unemployment paperwork they submitted while contesting my claim. Prior to my termination, I had never received formal discipline or written warnings. Just two months earlier, I had earned Presidents Club, one of the company’s highest performance recognitions. Going from being recognized as a top performer to being terminated without a meaningful explanation was shocking and left me questioning the company’s commitment to transparency and fairness. In my experience, Human Resources did not provide answers or advocate for transparency. Instead, I felt they supported leadership’s decision without giving me the information I was requesting. During my years with the company, I also observed situations involving other employees that, in hindsight, made me question how employment decisions were handled. After my own experience, I came away feeling that performance alone did not determine job security. I also perceived that long-tenured employees were treated differently than newer employees, regardless of performance. One of the most unsettling parts of my experience was feeling that if leadership became unhappy with an employee, that employee could be terminated with little explanation. Whether or not that was actually the reason in every case, it created an environment where I felt job security depended more on staying in favor than on performance. That uncertainty made the workplace feel unpredictable and, ultimately, unsettling. If transparency, communication, and feeling valued as an employee are important to you, my experience suggests you should ask careful questions before accepting a position. My experience at the end of my employment was completely different from the company I believed I had been working for during my first several years.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All